Pages

Saturday, December 8, 2018

An Exegete’s Question—Why?


Questioning the text is one of the exegete’s principle “stock-in-trade” procedures. 1 Peter 3:6 contains a participial phrase (μὴ φοβούμεναι μηδεμίαν πτόησιν) begging for an answer to a question, “Why include ‘terror’ (πτόησιν) in the verse?” The last term is defined syntactically as a cognate accusative of the inner object  (Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics, 1996, 189-90) affecting the meaning of the verbal to which it relates (φοβούμεναι). This usually involves emphasis. In this case, however, there is another reason for the cognate accusative.

The NT Greek word root (φοβ-) carries two basic senses: (1) to have fear, being afraid, and (2) to have respect, so used in verse 2 where the wife is told that the husband may be saved as he beholds his wife’s chaste and respectful  behavior towards him. In verse 6 the participle φοβούμεναι needed to be understood differently from the way in which Peter used the word root in the immediately preceding context (ἐν φόβῳ, verse 2) meaning “respect.” Therefore, Peter needed to do something to avoid the negative thought that he was encouraging wives not to show respect to their husbands. This was done by means of adding the cognate accusative of the inner object  (πτόησιν) to restrict the sense of the participle to fear. Thus, the wives are told that they like Sarah are not to live in fear  of their husbands. 
 
The exegetical importance of this observation is clear. The term φοβούμεναι does not refer to respect but to fear, and the reason for this syntactical construction is lexical and not emotional, being restricted by πτόησιν, the cognate accusative of the inner object. Furthermore, this negative phrase really does help define what genuine respect looks like for the wife in verses 1-6. It consists of living with her husband respectfully  (verse 2) and fearlessly  (verse 6) because she regards him as good and who would not knowingly do her harm.

The point of this article is simply to remind ourselves to question the biblical writer as to why he used the words he did in difficult passages so that we do not go beyond his intended meaning. Here we asked and answered, “Why insert terror (πτόησιν) into verse 6?”  Exegetes who focus much of their exegetical energy doing word meaning studies could miss Peter’s sense and move πτόησιν beyond its restrictive function  by emphasizing the “terror” idea. Thankfully, most English translations of this verse have done well in confining the participle to “fear.” The NIV captured Peter’s meaning admirably by translating, “and do not give way to fear.”

Saturday, December 1, 2018

Is Grammatical Diagramming Important?


A Greek grammatical diagram of Philippians 1:29 underscores both its importance and an unsettling theological truth—suffering for Christ is a gift of grace!
 
ὅτι ὑμῖν ἐχαρίσθη τὸ ὑπὲρ Χριστοῦ, οὐ μόνον τὸ εἰς αὐτὸν πιστεύειν ἀλλὰ καὶ τὸ ὑπὲρ αὐτοῦ πάσχειν


Recognizing this fact centers on a seemingly extraneous definite article, translated in some English versions as it or by ignoring the presence of the article. The NET Bible note is instructive,

For that which is on behalf of Christ has been granted to you—namely, not only to believe in him but also to suffer for him.” The infinitive phrases are epexegetical to the subject, τὸ ὑπὲρ Χριστοῦ (to huper Christou), which has the force of “the on-behalf-of-Christ thing,” or “the thing on behalf of Christ.” To translate this in English requires a different idiom.

 The subject of the main verb is a neuter nominative singular article the contents of which are defined by the two infinitive phrases that follow, believing and suffering. The subject of the verb cannot be limited to either believing or suffering. The gracious gift (ἐχαρίσθη) includes both. The correlative conjunctions οὐ μόνον and ἀλλὰ καὶ further validate this conclusion.

Diagramming has great scholarly and practical value for the preacher, teacher, and theologian. Here are a few key quotes from Lee L. Kantenwein, Diagrammatical Analysis:

(Page 7)“Diagrammatical analysis of the Biblical languages is an indispensable and methodological exegetical tool for the purpose of observing sentence structure and syntactical relationships.”

Again, (Page 9)“Therefore, diagramming is a diagnosis of syntax serving to pinpoint the relation that words have one to another, and thereby facilitating grammatical exegesis, the cornerstone of theological exegesis.”

Continuing, (Page 9)“The individual who is unable to express in some graphic way the structure of sentences is frequently not able to grasp the complete thought housed in a group of words.”

Finally, (Page 13) "There is no such thing as an unimportant detail or word of the Scripture text."

Diagramming a passage may be difficult and tedious work and at times reveal nothing more that what a simple reading of the text shows. At other times, however, frequently unexpectedly, diagramming becomes a critical pointer to discovery. Grammatical diagramming is inseparable to a comprehensive exegetical methodology.

 

Tuesday, April 3, 2018

The Communion Service--An Easter Celebration!


“The Communion Service—An Easter Celebration!”
1 Corinthians 11:17-34

Introduction

          “He Is Risen!” He is Risen, Indeed!” So goes the traditional greeting on Easter! Easter represents the most important holiday on the Christian calendar—more important than Christmas. If Christmas had not come the world would not have had a Savior. But he did come to take away the sins of the world by dying on the cross in our place. But if the dead Savior had not risen, writes the Apostle Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:14 and 17, our faith is an empty shell and we are still in our sins, forever lost. Thank God for Easter!


          Today we celebrate the Eucharist or Holy Communion. And although we do not often think of it as an Easter event, when we leave this morning my prayer is that we will never again take communion without connecting it to the resurrected Jesus Christ. Here is the theme of the sermon: The communion service is an ongoing, living celebration of and with the resurrected Jesus Christ. Today we will reflect on the broader Context of this passage, carefully examine the Contents of the verses 23-26, and conclude the message by partaking of the Communion elements. But first, let us bow in prayer.


I. The Context (1 Corinthians 11:17-22, 27-34)

         
          In the context, 1 Corinthians 11:17-22, Paul rebukes the Christians in Corinth. Verse 17 begins with these ominous words, “in the following instructions I do not commend you,” and at the end of the section in verse 22 he writes, “Shall I commend you in this? No, I will not.” What was occurring in the church that brought about Paul’s displeasure?


When the church gathered together to eat “The Lord’s Supper,” a phrase equivalent to our “Communion Service,” Paul took note of its divisiveness. “Therefore when you meet together, it is not to eat the Lord’s Supper, for in your eating each one takes his own supper first; and one is hungry and another is drunk” (verses 20-21). The play on words, “the Lord’s Supper,” and “his own supper” demonstrates that the church had allowed such abuse to turn the Lord’s Supper into an unholy mockery! Paul’s conclusion in verse 22 borders on sarcasm, “What! Do you not have houses in which to eat and drink? Or do you despise the church of God and shame those who have nothing? What shall I say to you? Shall I praise you? In this I will not praise you.” The Lord’s Supper is serious business and, turning our attention to verses 27-34, Communion must never be taken lightly!


Verse 27—Communion must be observed with genuine respect for Jesus Christ, “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord.” Verse 28—Communion must be done after individual self-examination, “Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup.” Verses 28, 30—Communion done in an unworthy manner invites judgment from the head of the “table,” the Lord Jesus Christ, “For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself.  That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died.” Holy Communion is serious business! Let us examine the contents of verses 24-26.


II. The Contents (1 Corinthians 11:23-26)


          I suspect that some of you are sitting there wondering how the title of this message, “The Communion Service—An Easter Celebration!” makes sense. Not only does it make sense, it is sensational!


          We all agree that the Communion Service memorializes a past event, the death of Jesus Christ on Good Friday. We also agree that the Communion Service looks forward to the coming again of Jesus Christ, For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until he comes” (verse 26). What we often overlook, however, is that sandwiched between these two events, the death of Jesus and his future second coming, is the celebration of and with the resurrected Jesus Christ at the Communion table (verses 23-26). I repeat the theme: The communion service is an ongoing, living celebration of and with the resurrected Jesus Christ.


          I know that this may sound strange if not shocking to you. But notice these five particulars.  First, Paul began the Communion passage in verse 23 with these words, “For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you.” He could not and did not receive the Lord’s message before his conversion, and after his conversion he could only have received it from the risen Lord. Second, the message Paul received from the risen Lord referred back in time to the Upper Room with Jesus and the twelve disciples, “the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, ‘This is my body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me.’ “In the same way also he took the cup, after supper, saying,” ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood. Do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of me’” (verses 24-25). Third, the command to observe Communion, “Do this,” was transferred into the present by Jesus. He inaugurated Communion as a present reenactment of the past event in the Upper Room. Fourth, Jesus is present at every Communion service. The twice-repeated command, “Do this in remembrance of me,” obscures this crucial element. This traditional translation commands the celebrants to only look back in time and recall what happened to Jesus in his passion. But this is not how Jesus told it to Paul or how Paul wrote it down for the Corinthians. The text reads literally, “Do this as my memorial.” Allow me a little latitude in explaining the difference between “in remembrance of me” and “as my memorial.” The pronoun “me” in the phrase “in remembrance of me” is objective. If we were to transpose the noun “remembrance” into a verb, as some translations do, “me” would be the direct object, “remember me.” In the literal terminology, “as my memorial,” the “my” is an adjective modifying the noun “remembrance.” If we transpose the noun into a verb, “my” would be the subject, “I remember.” And the “I” is Jesus who is present at every Communion service. In support of this dramatic concept, let us briefly consider a “memorial.” A memorial causes people to remember someone or something. Without people either thinking about or viewing the memorial, the memorial by itself means nothing. For the celebrants at the Lord’s Supper, the “memorial” evokes memories of Jesus and his passion and death. But what memories does the Communion as Jesus’ “memorial” bring to him who is also present at the Communion? If he were not present, why would he say that this is “my memorial”? What is he remembering? The writer of the book of Hebrews wrote, “[Jesus] who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame” (Verse 12:2), and this same Jesus presides over our Communion reenactment of the Lord’s Supper. He remembers the slaps, the whippings, the thorny crown, the nails in hands and feet—but at the Communion celebration, he feels joy as he looks out over the congregation. It was worth it all. We are worth it all!

          The fourth particular point was lengthy and crucial, but there is yet a fifth particular in the passage. The bread and the cup of which we are about to partake are symbols of Jesus’ passion and death and also of the New Covenant (verse 25).  This Covenant includes the forgiveness of sins and the promise of eternal life. At Communion Jesus offers both to us. His arms are outstretched. He lovingly appeals for our acceptance of these blessings.


III. The Communion Service


          It is time to reenact the Lord’s Supper. The communion service is an ongoing, living celebration of and with the resurrected Jesus Christ.  Jesus is in our midst.  He invites us to his Supper. But before we partake of the elements let us respond to Jesus’ outstretched arms and His offers of forgiveness and eternal life. We are all sinners in need of forgiveness. We just need to ask Him for it in silent prayer, and he lovingly grants it! Also, if we look back in our minds eye to the Upper Room with Jesus and the twelve disciples, one disciple was there who partook of the elements but who did not really believe in Jesus. His name was Judas Iscariot, the betrayer. But Jesus offered him the promise of forgiveness and eternal life as well. He does so today. If you are here today but have never personally accepted Jesus’ sacrifice on your behalf, he stands here with outstretched arms and pleading eyes for you to accept his free offer of forgiveness and eternal life. In the quiet of your own mind and heart, talk to him, acknowledge your need for forgiveness, believe in his sacrifice, and receive him and his gifts today. Let us all spend a quiet moment in prayer communing with the Christ of Easter, and then partake of the Communion elements.