Habakkuk
Exegetical Notes
Introduction
to Habakkuk
Title:
Habakkuk may be a name derived from meaning “to embrace” but this is uncertain.
Nothing is known about the author; what can be known must be gleaned from the
book.
Historical References and Date: 2 Kings 23:1-24:7 and 2 Chronicles
36:1-9
- “It is generally accepted that the reference to
the Babylonians (Hab. 1:6) places the book within the seventh century B.C.
More precise dating of the prophecy has provoked controversy. The dates
proposed fall into three time periods: the reign of Manasseh (697–642),
the reign of Josiah (640–609), and the reign of Jehoiakim (609–598) . . .
. Habakkuk wrote in a time of international crisis and national
corruption.” (Blue, J. R. (1985). Habakkuk, In J. F. Walvoord
& R. B. Zuck (Eds.), The Bible Knowledge Commentary: An
Exposition of the Scriptures (Vol. 1, p. 1506). Wheaton, IL:
Victor Books.) [Hereafter as BKC])
- “All conjecture and speculation aside it is
safe, and perhaps sufficient, to say that Habakkuk was an officially
ordained prophet who took part in temple liturgical singing. He was well
educated, deeply sensitive, and in his literary style was as much
a poet as he was a prophet. [Italics mine] Above all, he was God’s
choice servant who penned one of the most penetrating books of the Old
Testament.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
Theme: Faith in God and His character is the key to living
in times of violence and perverted justice.
The Syntax and Poetry Development
This series of blogs on the Book of Habakkuk begins with the grammatical
and syntactical data essential for developing a full-blown commentary. But
since the book represents Hebrew poetry, following the grammatical and
syntactical data are the poetics. For a complete understanding of each
section both are necessary. Also, I have sought to be consistent as
much as possible with the grammatical and syntactical terminology with frequent
use of Waltke, B. K., & O’Connor, M. P. (1990). An introduction to
biblical Hebrew syntax. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns. [Hereafter as Waltke
& O'Connor, Syntax]; Keil, C. F., & Delitzsch, F.
(1996). Commentary on the Old Testament. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
[Hereafter as K&D, loc. cit.] and others. The initial source references are
cited fully but subsequent references are abbreviated throughout this series.
For convenience the NASB is employed in all of the translations used in the
poetics. Finally, please keep in mind that this is a work in progress and
occasionally I will make changes.
I. Why Is Yahweh Unresponsive to My Prayers?
1:1-11
A. Habakkuk’s
Questions, 1:1-4
1
הַמַּשָּׂא
Article,
Demonstrative + Noun MNS Absolute, Predicate of Noun Clause, This [is]
the burden. “Heb ‘The burden’ (so KJV, ASV). The
Hebrew term מַשָּׂא (masa’),
usually translated ‘oracle’ (NAB, NEB, NASB, NIV, NRSV) or ‘utterance’ (BDB 672
s.v. III מַשָּׂא), in prophetic
literature is a technical term introducing a message from
the Lord (see Zech 9:1; 12:1; Mal 1:1). Since it derives from a verb
meaning ‘to carry,’ its original nuance was that of a burdensome message, that
is, one with ominous content.” (Biblical Studies Press. (2005). The NET
Bible First Edition; Bible. English, NET Bible.; The NET Bible. Biblical
Studies Press) [Hereafter as NET, loc. cit.]
אֲשֶׁ֣ר
Relative, Apposition to הַמַּשָּׂא, that.
חָזָ֔ה
QPf 3MS, Simple Pf, he saw.
חֲבַקּ֖וּק
Noun, Proper Name, Habakkuk.
הַנָּבִֽיא׃
Article, Particularizing + Noun MNS Absolute, N Apposition, the
Prophet.
2
עַד־אָ֧נָה
Preposition + Interrogative Pronoun, how long. Doing
double duty in the clauses.
יְהוָ֛ה
Noun MVS Absolute, Vocative Direct Address, O Yahweh.
שִׁוַּ֖עְתִּי
PiPf 1CS, Perfective Pf, have I been crying out.
וְלֹ֣א
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Negative Adverb, and . . . not. In
this series I use paratactic and hypotactic conjunctions to distinguish between
independent and dependent clauses. I have also adopted the two-fold description
of the functions of the waw as copulative and relative, the
latter representing some aspect of succession in the development.
תִשְׁמָ֑ע
QI 2MS, Progressive I, you have . . . been listening? Disjunctive
accent. In this series I refer to the accent system found in the primary text (Biblia
Hebraica Westmonasteriensis with Westminster Hebrew Morphology 4.18.
(2013). J. Alan Groves Center for Advanced Biblical Research). The accents are
integral to both the syntax and the poetics.
אֶזְעַ֥ק
QI 1CS, Progressive I, I keep crying out. עַד־אָ֧נָה is implied.
אֵלֶ֛יךָ
Preposition, Datival Indirect Object + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent
= יְהוָ֛ה, to you.
חָמָ֖ס
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object as an exclamation, violence!
וְלֹ֥א
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Negative Adverb, and . . .
not.
תוֹשִֽׁיעַ׃
HiI 2MS, Iterative I, you do . . . save?
3
לָ֣מָּה
Interrogative Pronoun, why [do]?
תַרְאֵ֤נִי
HiI 2MS, Progressive I + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct Object, Antecedent
= Habakkuk, you make me see.
אָ֙וֶן֙
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object, iniquity.
וְעָמָ֣ל
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct
Object, and trouble.
“The words ʾāwen and ʿāmāl are
conventional parallels (Job 4:8; 5:6), sometimes coordinated (Pss 10:7; 55:11;
90:10). The word ʿāmāl describes the agony of body or mind
that is humanity’s inevitable lot (Job 5:7), especially the troubled state of a
person worn out by work and the cares of this life.” (Andersen,
F. I. (2008). Habakkuk: a new translation with introduction and
commentary (Vol. 25, p. 113). New Haven; London: Yale University Press)
[Hereafter as Anderson, Habakkuk]
תַּבִּ֔יט
HiI 2MS, Progressive I, you cause me to look. Disjunctive
accent.
וְשֹׁ֥ד
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N in Noun
Clause, and destruction. Forward emphasis.
וְחָמָ֖ס
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MS Absolute, Subject
N in Noun Clause, and violence. Cp. verse 2. Forward
emphasis.
“Shōd is
violent treatment causing desolation. Châmâs is malicious
conduct intended to injure another. (K&D, loc. cit.) Habakkuk
reordered the words to highlight violence that begins and ends the list of
sins.
לְנֶגְדִּ֑י
Compounded
Preposition, Locale (metaphorical) + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent =
Habakkuk), [are] before me. Disjunctive accent.
וַיְהִ֧י
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Stative I, and . . .
exists.
רִ֦יב
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, dispute. The S may be a
collective for “disputes.”
וּמָד֖וֹן
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, strife. The
S may be a collective for “strifes.”
יִשָּֽׂא׃
QI 3MS, Progressive I, continues to rise up.
4
עַל־כֵּן֙
Preposition + Adverb of Manner, therefore. On this inferential
use see KB, Lexicon, 826. Also, “The consequences of this are
relaxation of the law, etc. עַל־כֵּן,
therefore, because God does not interpose to stop the wicked conduct.”
[K&D, loc. cit.]
תָּפ֣וּג
QI 3FS, Stative I, turns cold. “פּוּג,
to relax, to stiffen, i.e., to lose one’s vital strength, or
energy.” (K&D, loc. cit.) Also, “Heb ‘the law is numb,’
i.e., like a hand that has ‘fallen asleep’ (see Ps 77:2). Cf. NAB ‘is
benumbed’; NIV ‘is paralyzed.’” (NET, loc. cit.)
תּוֹרָ֔ה
Noun FNS Absolute, Subject N, the Law. Disjunctive accent.
וְלֹֽא־יֵצֵ֥א
Paratactic Conjunction, Result + Negative Adverb (See below) + QI 3MS,
Progressive I, and, as a result, . . . does not come forth.
לָנֶ֖צַח
Preposition, Reference + Noun MGS Construct, not forever. “לָנֶ֖צַח belongs to לֹא,
not for ever, i.e., never more.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
מִשְׁפָּ֑ט
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, justice. Disjunctive accent.
“The greatest tragedy, however, was the people’s neglect of God’s Law. Habakkuk
described the consequence: Therefore the Law is paralyzed (lit.,‘becomes
cool, numbed’). The divine Law appeared to have suffered a knockout; also
civic justice, Habakkuk said, never prevails, or never
came forth to fight (cf. ‘injustice,’ v. 3). It appears that wickedness was the
uncontested victor.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
כִּ֤י
Hypotactic Conjunction, Causal, because.
רָשָׁע֙
Substantival Adjective MNS Absolute, Collective S, Subject N in a Noun
Clause, the wicked men.
“For godless men (רָשָׁע, without an article,
is used with indefinite generality or in a collective sense) encircle the
righteous man, so that the righteous cannot cause right to prevail. Therefore
right comes forth perverted.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
מַכְתִּ֣יר
HiPtc MNS, Adjectival Ptc, Predicate N, [are] those who surround.
היה implied. “The use of the participle
as predicate is very frequent in noun-clauses.” (Gesenius, F. W. (1910). Gesenius’
Hebrew Grammar. (E. Kautzsch & S. A. E. Cowley, Eds.) (2d English
ed., p. 359). Oxford: Clarendon Press) [Hereafter as GKC, Grammar]
אֶת־הַצַּדִּ֔יק
Particle of Direct Object + Article, Particularizing
+ Substantival Adjective MAS Absolute, Collective S, the
righteous man. Disjunctive accent.
עַל־כֵּ֛ן
Preposition + Adverb of Manner, therefore.
יֵצֵ֥א
QI 3MS, Progressive I, comes forth.
מִשְׁפָּ֖ט
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, justice.
מְעֻקָּֽל׃
PuPtc MAS, Adverbial Ptc of Manner, twisted.
_______________
- Approximately 50% of the Hebrew OT involves
poetry. It is incumbent on the interpreter to both understand and insert
the results in one’s interpretation of the OT.
- Hebrew poetry is divided into lines of varying
numbers and lengths. These divisions are generally based on the Hebrew
accents marked in the Hebrew text. Though these accents are not “inspired”
they are important interpretation concerns involving punctuation of the
text that need to be considered.
- The most pervasive element in the poetry
is parallelism wherein, for example, one poetic line is
paralleled in another line that in some way adds to or makes sense of the
first line.
- Another common poetic device is
called chiasmus, basically an ABBA pattern where the A's are
logically connected as are the B's. Other patterns involving parallelism
also exist such as ABA or ABAB (where the B's sequentially parallel the
A's). The bullets will highlight more aspects of Hebrew poetry.
_______________
Verse 2
(A) How
long, O Lord, will I call for help,
(B) And You will not hear?
(A) [How long,] I cry out to You, “Violence!”
(B) Yet You do not save.
- ABAB pattern.
- “[How long]” – Double Duty (ellipsis is
common).
- Grammatical Parallelism.
- General to Specific Parallelism in bold font.
Verse 3
Why do You (A)
make me see (B) iniquity,
And (A) cause me to look on (B) wickedness?
Yes, destruction and violence are before me;
(B) Strife (A) exists and, (B) contention (A) arises.
- Chiasmus – ABBA pattern clear in the Hebrew text.
- Dirge (funeral meter) in line 1.
- Verse 3 fleshes out verse 2 and they should be
connected.
Verse 4
(A) Therefore the
law is ignored
(B) And justice is never upheld.
(B) For the wicked surround the righteous;
(A) Therefore justice comes out perverted.
- Chiastic: lines 1 and 4 are logically connected as are lines
2 and 3.
- Verse 4 fleshes out verse 3 with a conclusion.
- Therefore highlights the connectedness and is repeated
for emphasis.
Faith
In God And His Character Is The Key To Living In Times
Of Violence And Perverted Justice!
I. Why Is Yahweh
Unresponsive to My Prayers? 1:1-11
A. Habakkuk’s Questions, 1:1-4
B. Yahweh’s Responses,1:5-11
5
Disjunctive asyndeton (no
conjunction) moving on to God’s responses. See Bullinger, E. W.
(1898). Figures of speech used in the Bible. London; New York: Eyre
& Spottiswoode; E. & J. B. Young & Co. [Hereafter as
Bullinger, Figures of Speech]
רְא֤וּ
QImv 2MP, Imv of Command, look (of mental observaton,
BDB, Lexicon, 907), “The verbs are plural. The message
is not a private one for Habakkuk’s personal benefit. It is an oracle for
public proclamation. But, apart from the plural verbs, there is no hint as to
the identity of the intended audience.” (Anderson, Habakkuk, 139-140) Also,
“רָאָה (not with one’s eyes): —a. to
understand.” (Koehler, L., Baumgartner, W., Richardson, M. E. J., & Stamm,
J. J. (1994–2000). The Hebrew and Aramaic lexicon of the Old Testament
(electronic ed., p. 1159). Leiden: E.J. Brill.) [Hereafter as KB, Lexicon]
בַגּוֹיִם֙
Preposition, Locative (metaphorically) + Article, Particularizing + Noun MP
Absolute, at the nations.
וְֽהַבִּ֔יטוּ
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + HiImv 2MP, Imv of Command, and
observe. Disjunctive accent.
וְהִֽתַּמְּה֖וּ
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Hit Imv 2MP, Imv of Command, and
astonish one another.
תְּמָ֑הוּ
QImv 2MP, Imv of Command, be horrified. Disjunctive
accent. Copulative asyndeton (See Bullinger, Figures
of Speech, 138).
“The Hebrew text combines the Hitpael and Qal imperatival forms of the
verb תָּמַה (tamah,
‘be amazed’). A literal translation might read, ‘Shock yourselves and be
shocked!’ The repetition of sounds draws attention to the statement. The
imperatives here have the force of an emphatic assertion. On this use of the
imperative in Hebrew, see IBHS 572–73 GKC 324 §110.c and §34.4c.” (NET, loc.
cit.)
כִּי־פֹ֙עַל֙
Hypotactic
Conjunction, Causal + Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N in Noun Clause, because
a deed.
פֹּעֵ֣ל
QAPtc MNS,
Predicate N, [is] happening. The translations insert the pronoun
“I” but this is not needed and the clause could be construed as the object
of תַאֲמִ֖ינוּ. This would eliminate
the need to insert a copula. See NET, loc. cit.
“The verb is a participle that can refer to present, continuous activity or the
immediate future. The point is that God is already at work.” (Barker, K. L.
(1999). Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah (Vol. 20, pp. 301–302). Nashville:
Broadman & Holman Publishers.) [Hereafter as Barker, Habakkuk]
בִּֽימֵיכֶ֔ם
Preposition, Temporal + Noun MGP Construct + Personal Pronoun MGP, G of
Specification, Antecedent = Hearers/Readers), in your days. Disjunctive
accent.
לֹ֥א
Negative Adverb, not. Copulative asyndeton.
תַאֲמִ֖ינוּ
HiI 2MP, Future I, you will . . . believe.
כִּ֥י
Hypotactic Conjunction, Temporal, when. “In this context the
force of כִּי (ki) may
be ‘when,’ ‘if,’ or ‘even though.’” (NET, loc. cit.)
יְסֻפָּֽר׃
PuI 3MS, Future I, it is reported. If a real conditional clause
is meant it would relate to the future. “Compare Acts 13:41, where the
Apostle Paul threatens the despisers of the gospel with judgment in the words
of our verse.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
6
כִּֽי־הִנְנִ֤י
Paratactic Conjunction, Emphatic + Interjection + Personal Pronoun MNS,
Subject N in a Noun Clause, Antecedent = Yahweh), Indeed, behold
I. “הִנֵּה before the
participle always refers to the future.” K&D, loc. cit.)
מֵקִים֙
HiPtc MNS, Predicate N, [am] raising up.
אֶת־הַכַּשְׂדִּ֔ים
Particle of Direct Object + Article, Particularizing + Noun MAP
Absolute, the Chaldeans.
הַגּ֖וֹי
Article, Pronominal Demonstrative + Noun, MAS Absolute, A in
Apposition, that . . . nation.
הַמַּ֣ר
Article, Abstract + Adjective MAS, Attributive, bitter. “Heb
‘bitter.’ Other translation options for this word in this context include
‘fierce’ (NASB, NRSV); ‘savage’ (NEB); or ‘grim.’” (NET, loc. cit.)
וְהַנִּמְהָ֑ר
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Article, Abstract + NiPtc MAS,
Adjectival Attributive Ptc Absolute, impetuous. Disjunctive accent.
“Heb ‘hasty, quick.’ Some translate here ‘impetuous’ (so NEB, NASB, NIV, NRSV)
or ‘rash,’ but in this context greed may very well be the idea. The Babylonians
move quickly and recklessly ahead in their greedy quest to expand their
empire.” (NET, loc. cit.)
הַֽהוֹלֵךְ֙
Article, Pronominal Relative + QAPtc MAS Absolute, Attributive
Ptc , that continues to traverse.
לְמֶרְחֲבֵי־אֶ֔רֶץ
Preposition, Terminative + Noun, MGP Construct + Noun FGS Absolute,
Objective G, to the breadth of the earth.
לָרֶ֖שֶׁת
Preposition, Purpose + QInf Construct, to seize.
מִשְׁכָּנ֥וֹת
Noun FAP Absolute, A Direct Object, dwellings.
לֹּא־לֽוֹ׃
Negative Adverb + Preposition, Possessive + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Antecedent = הַגּ֖וֹי, not belong
to it. English uses “it” for the M pronoun.
7
אָיֹ֥ם
Adjective MAS Absolute, Attributive, terrifying. Forward
emphasis.
וְנוֹרָ֖א
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + NiPtc Absolute, Adjectival Attributive
Ptc, and to be feared. Forward emphasis.
ה֑וּא
Personal Pronoun MNS, Subject N in Noun Clause, Antecedent = הַגּ֖וֹי, it [is]. Disjunctive accent.
מִמֶּ֕נּוּ
Preposition, Source + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = הַגּ֖וֹי, from it. Asyndetic clause. Disjunctive
accent.
מִשְׁפָּט֥וֹ
Noun MNS Construct, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G,
Antecedent = הַגּ֖וֹי, its justice. Forward
emphasis.
וּשְׂאֵת֖וֹ
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun FNS Construct, Subject N +
Personal Pronoun MGS Absolute, Possessive G, Antecedent = הַגּ֖וֹי, and its authority. Forward emphasis.
יֵצֵֽא׃
QI 3MS, Progressive I, proceeds forth.
8
וְקַלּ֨וּ
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QPf 3CP, Persistent Pf, and they
are swifter.
מִנְּמֵרִ֜ים
Preposition, Comparative + Noun MGP Absolute, than leopards.
סוּסָ֗יו
Noun MNP Construct, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = הַגּ֖וֹי, its
horses. Disjunctive accent.
וְחַדּוּ֙
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QPf 3CP, Persistent Pf, and
they are quicker. “Heb ‘sharper,’ in the sense of ‘keener’ or ‘more alert.’
Some translate ‘quicker’ on the basis of the parallelism with the first line”
(NET, loc. cit.)
מִזְּאֵ֣בֵי
Preposition, Comparative + Noun MGP Construct, than wolves of.
עֶ֔רֶב
Noun MGS, Descriptive G, the evening. Disjunctive accent. Some
translations emend the text with עֲרָבָה (“desert”).
“Wolves of the evening (cf. Zeph. 3:3) are wolves which go out in the evening
in search of prey, after having fasted through the day.” (K&D, loc.
cit.)
וּפָ֖שׁוּ
Paratactic, Conjunction, Relative + QPf 3CP, Persistent Pf, and
they gallop. “Spring about” (Brown, F., Driver, S. R., & Briggs, C. A.
(1977). Enhanced Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon (p. 807).
Oxford: Clarendon Press) [Hereafter as BDB, Lexicon]
פָּֽרָשָׁ֑יו
Noun MNP Construct, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = הַגּ֖וֹי, its cavalry. Disjunctive
accent.
וּפָֽרָשָׁיו֙
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Noun MNP Construct, Subject N + Personal
Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = הַגּ֖וֹי), its
cavalry. Repetition for effect. Forward emphasis.
מֵרָח֣וֹק
Preposition, Source + Adjective MGS, from afar.
יָבֹ֔אוּ
QI 3MP Absolute, Progressive I, they come. Disjunctive accent.
יָעֻ֕פוּ
QI 3MP Absolute, Progressive I, they fly. Disjunctive
accent. Asyndeton.
כְּנֶ֖שֶׁר
Preposition Comparative + Noun MGS Absolute, like an eagle.
חָ֥שׁ
QAPtc MGS, Adjectival Attributive, hurrying. The form for the
Ptc and Pf 3MS are the same but the 3CP is distinct.
לֶאֱכֽוֹל׃
Preposition, Purpose + QInf Construct, Complement of חָ֥שׁ to devour. KB, Lexicon, 300.
9
כֻּלֹּה֙
Noun MNS Construct, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Partitive G,
Antecedent = וּפָֽרָשָׁיו֙), every one
of them. Collective S. Forward emphasis.
לְחָמָ֣ס
Preposition, Purpose + Noun MGS Absolute, for violence.
יָב֔וֹא
QI 3MS, Progressive I, comes. Disjunctive accent.
מְגַמַּ֥ת
Noun FNS Construct, Subject N in Noun Clause, the totality of.
Forward emphasis. Asyndetic.
פְּנֵיהֶ֖ם
Noun MGP Construct, Partitive G + Personal Pronoun MGP, Possessive G,
Collective P, Antecedent = כֻּלֹּה֙, their
faces. See Bullinger, Figures of Speech, 640, Synecdoche of
the part standing for the whole.
קָדִ֑ימָה
Noun MNS Absolute, Predicate N + Directional ה, [are]
facing towards the east. Disjunctive accent.
וַיֶּאֱסֹ֥ף
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Progressive I, Countable
S, and he gathers. The 3MS refers here to the leader of the
Babylonians.
כַּח֖וֹל
Preposition, Comparative + Article, Generic + Noun MGS Absolute, like
the sand. Forward emphasis.
שֶֽׁבִי׃
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object, captives.
10
וְהוּא֙
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Personal Pronoun MNS, Emphasis,
Antecedent = Subject of וַיֶּאֱסֹ֥ף above, and
himself.
בַּמְּלָכִ֣ים
Preposition, Specifying + Article, Particularizing + Noun MGP
Absolute, regarding kings. Forward emphasis.
יִתְקַלָּ֔ס
HitI 3MS, Iterative I, he makes fun. Disjunctive accent.
וְרֹזְנִ֖ים
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + QAPtc MNP Absolute, Subject N in Noun
Clause, and rulers. Forward emphasis.
מִשְׂחָ֣ק
Noun MNS Absolute, Predicate N, [are] a laughing matter.
ל֑וֹ
Preposition, Reference + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = הוּא֙), to him. Disjunctive
accent.
ה֚וּא
Personal Pronoun MNS, Emphatic, Antecedent = ל֑וֹ), himself.
Explanatory asyndeton. Forward emphasis.
לְכָל־מִבְצָ֣ר
Preposition, Reference + Noun MGS Construct, Adjectival Use (See KB, Lexicon, 474)
+ Noun MGS Absolute, at every fortified city. Forward emphasis.
יִשְׂחָ֔ק
QI 3MS, Progressive I, he laughs. Disjunctive accent.
וַיִּצְבֹּ֥ר
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Progressive I, and pours
. . . into a heap.
עָפָ֖ר
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object, earth.
וַֽיִּלְכְּדָֽהּ׃
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Progressive I + Personal Pronoun
FAS, A Direct Object, Antecedent = city (עיר feminine,
sense agreement with מִבְצָ֣ר), and
captures it.
11
אָ֣ז
Adverb of Time, then.
חָלַ֥ף
QPf 3MS, Iterative Pf, he passes through. “The subject to
châlaph is not rūăch, but the Chaldaean (הוּא,
v. 10); and rūăch is used appositionally, to denote the manner in which it
passes along.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
ר֛וּחַ
Noun FNS Appositional N to previous subject, wind. See above.
וַֽיַּעֲבֹ֖ר
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Progressive I, and
continues on.
וְאָשֵׁ֑ם
Paratactic Conjunction, Resultative + QPf 3MS, Predicate N in Noun
Clause, and [he is] a guilty person. Disjunctive accent. “The
omission [ellipsis] arises not from want of thought, or lack of care, or from
accident, but from design, in order that we may not stop to think of, or lay
stress on, the word omitted, but may dwell on the other words which are thus
emphasised by the omission.” (Bullinger, Figures of Speech, 1)
ז֥וּ
Demonstrative Pronoun MNS, Cataphoric, this. Explanatory Asyndeton.
כֹח֖וֹ
Noun MNS, Subject N in Noun Clause + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G,
Antecedent = ה֚וּא, his
strength. Perhaps “this strength of his.”
לֵאלֹהֽוֹ׃
Preposition, Possessive + Noun MGS Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS, G of
Relationship, Antecedent = ה֚וּא), [he
attributes] to his god. “Imputing this his power unto his god; more
literally, this his power is his god; Revised Version, even he whose might is
his god. He defies the Lord, and makes his might his god.” (Spence-Jones, H. D.
M. (Ed.). (1909). Habakkuk (p. 3). London; New York: Funk & Wagnalls
Company) [Hereafter as Spence-Jones, Habakkuk]
_______________
Verse 5
(A) “Look among
the nations! Observe!
(B) Be astonished! Wonder!
(A) Because I am doing something in your days—
(B) You would not believe if you were told.
- ABAB parallelism in lines 1-2 and 3-4.
- Cp. verse 3—same words for “seeing.”
- Repetitions—same sounds;
different forms (lines 2 & 3).
Verse 6
(A) For behold, I
am raising up the Chaldeans,
(B) That fierce and impetuous people
(A) Who march throughout the earth
(B) To seize dwelling places which are not theirs.
- ABAB Pattern.
- Sound parallels with “fierce” and “impetuous”
(hamar/hanmehar).
- Verse 6 is explanatory of verse 5.
Verse 7
They are dreaded
and feared;
Their justice and authority originate with themselves.
- Line 1 = Expansion of verse 6 line 2
- Line 2 = Expansion of verse 6 line 4
Verse 8
(A) Their horses
are swifter than leopards
And keener than wolves
in the evening.
(B) Their horsemen come galloping,
(B) Their horsemen come from afar;
(A) They fly like an eagle swooping down to devour.
- Chiastic pattern where lines 1 and 4 correlate as do lines
2 and 3.
- “Keener” parallels “swifter” and means
“quicker.”
- Lines 2 & 3 = Repetition of sounds and
words (pashu//parshy//parshy).
- “Swooping” means “hurrying” and parallels line
1.
Verse 9
(A) All of
them come for violence.
(B) Their horde of faces moves forward.
(A) They collect captives like sand.
- This verse expands verse 8.
- ABA Pattern where line 3 parallels line 1.
Verse 10
(A) They mock at kings
(B) And rulers are a laughing matter to
them.
(B) They laugh at every fortress
(A) And heap up rubble to capture it.
- Chiastic Pattern.
- Similar sounds in “fortress” and “heap up”
(mivtsar/yitsbor).
- Mockery/laughing = Repetitions.
Verse 11
Then they
will sweep through like the wind and pass on.
But they will be held guilty,
They whose strength is their god.”
·
Near synonyms in line 1.
- One word conclusion in line 2.
- Line 2 represents an effect whereas
line 3 is the cause.
Faith
In God And His Character Is The Key To Living In Times
Of Violence And Perverted Justice!
I. Why Is Yahweh Unresponsive to My Prayers? 1:1-11
A. Habakkuk’s Questions, 1:1-4
B. Yahweh’s Responses,1:5-11
C. Habakkuk’s Theological Questions, 1:12-17
12
הֲל֧וֹא
Interrogative Particle + Negative Adverb, [are] . . . not? The
rhetorical question expects the answer “Yes!”
אַתָּ֣ה
Personal Pronoun MNS, Subject N in Noun Clause, Antecedent = Yahweh, you.
מִקֶּ֗דֶם
Preposition, Source + Noun MGS Absolute, from prehistoric time. Disjunctive
accent.
יְהוָ֧ה
Noun MVS, V Direct Address, O Yahweh. Conjunctive accent
connecting the three divine descriptions.
אֱלֹהַ֛י
Noun MVP Construct, V Direct Address, Honorific P + Personal Pronoun MGS, G of
Relationship, Antecedent = Habakkuk, O My God. Disjunctive
accent.
קְדֹשִׁ֖י
Adjective MVS Construct, Substantival, V of Direct Address, Antecedent =
Habakkuk, O My Holy One. See the note below. Disjunctive
accent.
“The three predicates applied to God have equal weight in the question. The God
to whom the prophet prays is Jehovah, the absolutely constant One, who is
always the same in word and work (see at Gen. 2:4); He is also Elohai, my,
i.e., Israel’s, God, who from time immemorial has proved to the people whom He
had chosen as His possession that He is their God; and קְדֹשִׁי, the Holy One of Israel, the absolutely Pure One, who cannot
look upon evil, and therefore cannot endure that the wicked should devour the
righteous (v. 13).” (K&D, loc. cit.)
לֹ֣א
Negative Adverb, not. Disjunctive asyndeton.
נָמ֑וּת
QI 1CP, Future I, we will . . . die. NET Note, loc. cit,: “The
MT reads, ‘we will not die,’ but an ancient scribal tradition has ‘you [i.e.,
God] will not die.’ This is preferred as a more difficult reading that can
explain the rise of the other variant. Later scribes who copied the manuscripts
did not want to associate the idea of death with God in any way, so they
softened the statement to refer to humanity.” Also, “. . . the immutable and
everlasting Lord (cf. 3:6) who will not break His covenant with Israel.” (BKC,
loc. cit.) Disjunctive accent.
יְהוָה֙
Noun MVS, V Direct Address, O Yahweh.
לְמִשְׁפָּ֣ט
Preposition, Purpose + Noun MGS Construct, for judgment. Forward
emphasis.
שַׂמְתּ֔וֹ
QPf 2MS, Constative Pf + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct Object, Antecedent
= Babylonian Nation, You appointed it. Disjunctive accent.
וְצ֖וּר
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MVS Absolute, V Direct Address, and
O Rock. A reference to Yahweh in the parallelism. The additional
variant (1st Personal Pronoun) can be ignored since it has no
MSS for support.
“‘Rock’ or ‘Cliff.’ This divine epithet views God as a place where one can go
to be safe from danger. The translation ‘Protector’ conveys the force of the
metaphor (cf. KJV, NEB ‘O mighty God’).” (NET, loc. cit.)
לְהוֹכִ֥יחַ
Preposition, Purpose + HiInf Construct, to bring punishment.
יְסַדְתּֽוֹ׃
QPf 2MS, Constative Pf + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct Object, Antecedent =
Babylonian Nation, Collective S, you destined it.
13
טְה֤וֹר
Adjective MNS Construct, Substantival Predicate N in Noun Clause, [you
are ethically] purer (see KB, Lexicon, 369). Forward
emphasis. Disjunctive asyndeton. K&D, loc. cit., take this
as a vocative; NET, NASB, ESV as a predicate.
“In v. 13, טְהֹור עֵינַיִם, with the two clauses
dependent upon it, stands as a vocative, and טְהֹור followed
by מִן as a comparative: purer of eyes
than to be able to see. This epithet is applied to God as the pure One, whose
eyes cannot bear what is morally unclean, i.e., cannot look upon evil.”
(K&D, loc. cit.)
עֵינַ֙יִם֙
Noun MGD Absolute, G of Reference, of eyes.
מֵרְא֣וֹת
Preposition, Comparative + QInf Construct, than to put up with.
רָ֔ע
Adjective MAS Absolute, Substantival, A Direct Object, evil. Disjunctive
accent.
וְהַבִּ֥יט
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + HiInf Construct, Complementary Inf, and
to look. Forward emphasis.
אֶל־עָמָ֖ל
Preposition, Directive + Noun MGS Absolute, at harm.
לֹ֣א
Negative Adverb, not.
תוּכָ֑ל
QI 2MS, I of Capability, you are . . . able. Disjunctive
accent.
לָ֤מָּה
Preposition, Reference + Interrogative Pronoun, why? Disjunctive asyndeton.
תַבִּיט֙
HI 2MS, Customary I, do you look on.
בּֽוֹגְדִ֔ים
QAPtc MAP, A Direct Object, those who continue to act
treacherously. Disjunctive accent.
תַּחֲרִ֕ישׁ
HiI 2MS, Progressive I, [Why] do you remain silent. The לָ֤מָּה above does double duty.
Conjunctive asyndeton. Disjunctive accent.
בְּבַלַּ֥ע
Preposition, Temporal + PiInf Construct, Functioning as a verb (see Waltke
& O’Connor, Syntax, 610), when . . . swallows up.
רָשָׁ֖ע
Adjective MNS Absolute, Subject N, the wicked.
צַדִּ֥יק
Adjective MAS Absolute, Substantival, A Direct Object, the righteous.
מִמֶּֽנּוּ׃
Preposition, Comparative + Personal Pronoun MGS, more than
him? Collective S. The translations read “they/them.”
14
וַתַּעֲשֶׂ֥ה
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 2MS, Preterite I, and you
made. Does double duty for the next clause as well.
“וַתַּעֲשֶׂה is not dependent upon לָמָּה, but continues the address in a simple
picture, in which the imperfect with Vav convers. represents the act as the
natural consequence of the silence of God.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
אָדָ֖ם
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object, Collective S, mankind.
כִּדְגֵ֣י
Preposition, Comparative + Noun MGP Construct, like fish of.
הַיָּ֑ם
Article, Particularizing + Noun MGS Absolute, the sea. Disjunctive
accent.
כְּרֶ֖מֶשׂ
Preposition, Comparative + Noun MGS Absolute, Collective S, like
creeping things. Seeוַתַּעֲשֶׂ֥ה above.
לֹא־מֹשֵׁ֥ל
Negative Adverb + QAPtc MAS, Adjectival Gerundive Ptc, [that do]
not have one ruling. “The point of comparison lies in the relative
clause לֹא־מֹשֵׁל בֹּו, “which has no ruler”
(K&D, loc. cit.) Numerous translations agree on the relative clause
interpretation.
בּֽוֹ׃
Preposition, Condition + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = רֶ֖מֶשׂ, Collective S, over them.
15
Explanatory asyndeton.
כֻּלֹּה֙
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object + Personal Pronoun MGS, Collective S,
Antecedent = אָדָ֖ם, All of
them. Forward emphasis. “כֻּלֹּה,
pointing back to the collective ’âdâm, is the object, and is
written first for the sake of emphasis.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
בְּחַכָּ֣ה
Preposition, Means + Noun FGS Absolute, with a fishhook. Only
OT use.
הֵֽעֲלָ֔ה
HiPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, Collective S, they bring up. Disjunctive
accent.
יְגֹרֵ֣הוּ
QI 3MS, Customary I, Collective S + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct Object,
Antecedent = אָדָ֖ם, Collective S, they
drag them away. Copulative asyndeton.
בְחֶרְמ֔וֹ
Preposition, Means + Noun MGS Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G,
Collective S, Antecedent = Subject of יְגֹרֵ֣הוּ, in
their dragnet.
וְיַאַסְפֵ֖הוּ
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Customary I, Collective S +
Personal Pronoun MAS Construct, A Direct Object, Antecedent = אָדָ֖ם, and gather them.
בְּמִכְמַרְתּ֑וֹ
Preposition, Means + Noun FGS Construct, + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G,
Collective S, Antecedent = Subject of וְיַאַסְפֵ֖הוּ,
in their net. Disjunctive accent.
עַל־כֵּ֖ן
Preposition, Reference + Adverb, Manner, therefore. “on this
account, for that reason” (KB, Lexicon, 826).
יִשְׂמַ֥ח
QI 3MS, Customary I, Collective S, they rejoice.
וְיָגִֽיל
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Customary I, Collective S, and
shout in exultation.
16
עַל־כֵּן֙
Preposition, Reference + Adverb, Manner, therefore. See above.
יְזַבֵּ֣חַ
PiI 3MS, Customary I, Collective S, they sacrifice.
לְחֶרְמ֔וֹ
Preposition, Indirect Object + Noun MGS Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive G, Collective S, Antecedent = Subject of יְזַבֵּ֣חַ, to their dragnet. Disjunctive
accent.
וִֽיקַטֵּ֖ר
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + HiI 3MS, Customary I, Collective S, and
burn incense.
לְמִכְמַרְתּ֑וֹ
Preposition, Indirect Object + Noun FGS Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive G, Collective S, Antecedent = Subject of וִֽיקַטֵּ֖ר, to their net. Disjunctive
accent.
כִּ֤י
Adverb of Manner, thus.
בָהֵ֙מָּה֙
Preposition, Means + Personal Pronoun MGS, Collective S, Antecedent =
nets, by them.
שָׁמֵ֣ן
Adjective MS Absolute, Substantival, Predicate N in Noun Clause, Collective
S, [is] fat. Forward emphasis.
חֶלְק֔וֹ
Noun MNS Construct, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G, Collective
S, Antecedent = Subject of וִֽיקַטֵּ֖ר, their
portion. Disjunctive accent.
וּמַאֲכָל֖וֹ
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MNS Construct, Subject N in Noun
Clause + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G, Antecedent = Subject of וִֽיקַטֵּ֖ר, their food.
בְּרִאָֽה׃
Adjective FNS Absolute, Substantival, Predicate N, Collective S, [is]rich.
17
הַ֥עַל
Interrogative, Rhetorical (see KB, Lexicon, 236; BDB, Lexicon,
209) + Preposition, Reference, ___. Does duty for two clauses.
כֵּ֖ן
Adverb, Manner, therefore. See at verse 6.
יָרִ֣יק
HiI 3MS, Customary I, Collective S, they empty out.
חֶרְמ֑וֹ
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G,
Collective S, Antecedent = Subject of יָרִ֣יק, their
dragnet. Disjunctive accent.
וְתָמִ֛יד
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Adverb of Time, and continually.
לַהֲרֹ֥ג
Preposition, Purpose + QInf Construct, [exist] to destroy. Forward
emphasis.
גּוֹיִ֖ם
Noun MAP Absolute, A Direct Object, nations? Disjunctive
accent.
לֹ֥א
Negative Adverb, not. Copulative asyndeton. “לֹא יַחְמֹול is a subordinate clause appended
in an adverbial sense: unsparingly, without sparing.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
יַחְמֽוֹל׃
QI 3MS,
Customary I, Collective S, they do . . . have compassion.
_______________
Verse 12
Are You not from everlasting,
O LORD, my God, my Holy One?
We will not die.
You, O LORD, have appointed them to judge;
And You, O Rock, have established them to
correct.
·
Rhetorical question in line 1 expects a “Yes” answer.
·
Five vocatives.
·
The verbs “appointed” and “established” are near
synonyms.
·
Line 3 and 4 are grammatically parallel.
·
Line 4 expands the meaning of line 3.
Verse 13
(A) Your eyes are too pure to approve evil,
(B) And You can not look on wickedness with
favor.
(B) Why do You look with favor
On those who
deal treacherously?
(A) Why are You silent when the wicked swallow up
Those more righteous than they?
·
3 bold words for “seeing.”
·
Chiastic with (A)’s and (B)’s in parallel.
Verse 14
Why have You made men like the fish of the sea,
Like creeping things without a ruler over them?
·
“Why” is taken from verse 15 in the parallelism without
another interrogative in verse 14.
·
The ESV, NET, NIV do not see a question. The NASB and
NKJV do.
·
Line 2 supplements line 1.
·
In the parallelism the “creeping things” of line 2 are
probably from the sea.
Verse 15
(A) The Chaldeans bring all of
them up with a hook,
(B) Drag them away with their net,
(B) And gather them together in their fishing net.
(A) Therefore they rejoice and are glad.
·
Chiastic.
·
Lines 2 and 3 are cause and effect.
Verse 16
(A) Therefore they offer a sacrifice to
their net
(B) and burn incense to their fishing net;
(A) Because through these things their catch is large,
(B) And their food is plentiful.
·
ABAB Parallelism Pattern.
·
“Therefore” repeats and connects verse 16 to verse 15
sequentially.
Verse 17
Will they therefore empty their net
And continually slay nations without sparing?
·
Line 2 interprets line 1.
Faith In God And
His Character Is The Key To Living In Times
Of Violence And
Perverted Justice!
I. Why Is Yahweh Unresponsive to My Prayers? 1:1-11
II. Yahweh’s Response Concerning Babylon, 2:1-20
A. Habakkuk’s Role and Expectation,
2:1
B. The Vision and General Indictment concerning
Babylon, 2-5
1
עַל־מִשְׁמַרְתִּ֣י
Preposition,
Locative + Noun FGS Construct Personal Pronoun MGS, Subjective G, Antecedent =
Habakkuk, upon my observation post. Forward emphasis.
אֶעֱמֹ֔דָה
QCoh 1CS, Coh of
Resolve, I am determined to stand. Disjunctive accent.
וְאֶֽתְיַצְּבָ֖ה
Paratactic
Conjunction, Relative + HitCoh 1CS, Coh of Resolve, and I am determined
to station myself.
עַל־מָצ֑וֹר
Preposition,
Locative + Noun MGS Absolute, upon the watchtower. Disjunctive
accent.
וַאֲצַפֶּ֗ה
Preposition,
Relative + PiCoh 1CS, Coh of Resolve, and I am resolved to keep
watch. Disjunctive accent.
לִרְאוֹת֙
Preposition,
Purpose + QInf Absolute, to see.
מַה־יְדַבֶּר־בִּ֔י
Interrogative,
Indirect Rhetorical Question + PiI 3MS, Future I + Preposition, Indirect Object
+ Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = Habakkuk, what he will say to me. K&D,
loc. cit. has an alternative interpretation.
וּמָ֥ה
Paratactic
Conjunction, Relative + Interrogative, Indirect Rhetorical Question, and
what.
אָשִׁ֖יב
HiI 1CS, Future
I, I will return.
עַל־תּוֹכַחְתִּֽי׃
Preposition,
Reference + Noun FGS Absolute + Personal Pronoun MGS, Subjective G, Antecedent
= Habakkuk, concerning the reproof I gave. Disjunctive accent.
The translations vary between Objective G and Subjective G. “Probably Habakkuk
referred to his own complaint lodged in his dialogue with God (Hab. 1:2–4,
12–17). Some translators, however, say that the ‘complaint’ (tôḵaḥaṯ,
‘correction, rebuke, or argument’) was against the prophet
rather than by the prophet. Thus they render the phrase, ‘what
to answer when I am rebuked’ (niv marg.).” (BKC, loc. cit.) See KB, Lexicon,
1698 for “objection” translation; Also, Holladay, W. L., & Köhler, L.
(2000). A concise Hebrew and Aramaic lexicon of the Old Testament,
387. Leiden: Brill. [Hereafter as Holladay, Lexicon]
2
וַיַּעֲנֵ֤נִי
Paratactic
Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct Object,
Antecedent = Habakkuk, and . . . answered me.
יְהוָה֙
Noun MNS
Absolute, Subject N, Yahweh.
וַיֹּ֔אמֶר
Paratactic
Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Sequential I, and said. Disjunctive
accent.
כְּת֣וֹב
QImv 2MS, Imv of
Command, write.
חָז֔וֹן
Noun MAS
Absolute, A Direct Object, the vision. Disjunctive accent.
וּבָאֵ֖ר
Paratactic
Conjunction, Relative + PiImv 2MS, Imv of Command, and make
plain. Lewis, J. P. (1999). 194 בָּאַר.
R. L. Harris, G. L. Archer Jr., & B. K. Waltke (Eds.), Theological Wordbook
of the Old Testament (electronic ed., p. 87). Chicago: Moody Press. [Hereafter
as TWOT, Lexicon]
עַל־הַלֻּח֑וֹת
Preposition,
Locative + Noun FGP Absolute, upon tablets. Disjunctive
accent.
לְמַ֥עַן
Preposition,
Purpose, in order that.
יָר֖וּץ
QI 3MS, Modal of
Possibility I, might run. “Heb ‘might run,’ which
here probably means ‘run [through it quickly with one’s eyes],’ that is, read
it easily. (NET, loc. cit.)
ק֥וֹרֵא
QAPtc MNS,
Substantival Subject N, he who reads.
בֽוֹ׃
Preposition,
Direct Object (as in most translations) + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent
= חָז֔וֹן, in it. Disjunctive
accent. “The word bô, ‘in it,’ is admittedly difficult; the sense of the
preposition is hard to establish. It could be ‘from it’ or ‘by means of it.’”
(Anderson, Habakkuk, 204) Also, “[T]he point is that the messenger
would read it and then run to spread the news to others.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
3
כִּ֣י
Hypotactic
Conjunction, Causal, because.
ע֤וֹד
Adverb of
Time, still. “‘For the vision is still for the appointed
time.’ The Hebrew word . . . is better emended to . . . ‘witness’ in light
of the parallelism.” (NET, loc. cit.) The LXX has ἔτι. Most of the translations read as the Hebrew text.
חָזוֹן֙
Noun MNS
Absolute, Subject N in Noun Clause, the vision. There are 7
references to the vision in the following clauses.
לַמּוֹעֵ֔ד
Preposition,
Directive + Noun MGS Absolute, [is] for an appointed time.
“The prophecy
is לַמֹּועֵד, for the appointed
time; i.e., it relates to the period fixed by God for its realization, which
was then still (עֹוד) far off. לְ denotes direction towards a certain point either
of place or time. The vision had a direction towards a point, which, when
looked at from the present, was still in the future.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
וְיָפֵ֥חַ
Paratactic
Conjunction, Relative + HiI 3MS, Progressive I, and it pants. Found
in the Dead Sea Scroll 1Q Hab יפיח לקץ meaning
“to pant after.” See the following notes.
“יָפֵחַ is not an adjective, as in Ps. 27:12, but the third
pers. imperf. hiphil of pūăch; and the contracted form (יָפֵחַ for יָפִיחַ), without a voluntative meaning, is the
same as we frequently meet with in the loftier style of composition. וְלֹא יְכַזֵּב, “and does not deceive,” i.e., will
assuredly take place.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
“Heb ‘and
a witness to the end and it does not lie.’ The Hebrew term יָפֵחַ (yafeakh) has been traditionally
understood as a verb form from the root פּוּחַ (puakh,
‘puff, blow’; cf. NEB ‘it will come in breathless haste’; NASB ‘it hastens
toward the goal’) but recent scholarship has demonstrated that it is actually a
noun meaning ‘witness’ (cf. NIV ‘it speaks of the end / and will not prove
false’; NRSV ‘it speaks of the end, and does not lie’). See J. J. M.
Roberts, Nahum, Habakkuk, and Zephaniah (OTL), 106. ‘The end’
corresponds to ‘the appointed time’ of the preceding line and refers to the
time when the prophecy to follow will be fulfilled. “ (NET, loc. cit.)
“Rudolph (Micha,
Nahum, Habakuk, Zephanja, 212) notes that the Dead Sea Scroll has confirmed the
reading as from a verb meaning ‘pant after,’ but he contends that such a
meaning does not fit the context. He suggests that Prov 12:17 is the closest
parallel, giving a meaning of to make known, to state, thus leading to a
translation much like NIV. Elliger (Das Buch der zwölf kleinen Propheten II,
38) questions his own conclusion as he translates reist auf, ‘set out after,’
claiming support from the LXX, but then says perhaps we can make do with the MT
and translate sie raunt vom Ende, ‘it whispers of the end.’” (Quotes from
Barker, Habakkuk, 323)
לַקֵּ֖ץ
Preposition,
Directive + Article, Particularizing, Noun MGS Absolute, to the
end. Parallels לַמּוֹעֵ֔ד above.
וְלֹ֣א
Paratactic
Conjunction, Relative + Negative Adverb, and [the vision] . . . not.
יְכַזֵּ֑ב
PiI 3MS, Future
I, will . . . lie.
אִם־יִתְמַהְמָהּ֙
Hypotactic
Conjunction, Conditional + HitI 3MS, Conditional I, if it should
delay. Protasis of a real condition.
חַכֵּה־ל֔וֹ
PiImv 2MS, Imv of
Command + Preposition, Directive + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = חָזוֹן֙ above, wait for it.
כִּֽי־בֹ֥א
Hypotactic
Conjunction, Causal + QInf Absolute, Affirmation, because surely . . .
coming.
יָבֹ֖א
QI 3MS, Future
I, it will . . . be coming.
לֹ֥א
Negative
Adverb, not. Conjunctive Asyndeton.
יְאַחֵֽר׃
PiI 3MS, Future
I, it will . . . delay. Disjunctive accent.
4
Asyndetic and
transitional to the contents of the vision. “God answered the prophet by means
of a strong contrast. The first half of the verse apparently refers to the
wicked described in 1:7, 11, 13 (without using the term).” (Barker, Habakkuk,
324) See the extensive notes at verses 4 and 5.
הִנֵּ֣ה
Interjection, look! “calls
attention to the following noun” (KB, Lexicon, 252) and transitions
to the Babylonian leader.
עֻפְּלָ֔ה
PuPf 3FS,
Perfective Pf, Indefinite 3FS Subject in Noun Clause, he has been and
is puffed up! Disjunctive accent. The rabia separates
the clause from the following unlike many of the translations. This is seen as
a general statement that is expanded in the following clause. The ellipsis brings
emphasis to what is written; the NASB, NKJV, NRSV, YLT reflect this emphasis.
לֹא־יָשְׁרָ֥ה
Negative Adverb +
QPf 3FS, Perfective Pf, Explanatory asyndeton. [נַפְשׁ֖וֹ] has been and is not upright. ‘The
thought [behind עֻפְּלָ֔ה] is explained and
strengthened by לֹא יָשְׁרָה, ‘his soul is not
straight.’” (K&D, loc. cit.)
נַפְשׁ֖וֹ
Noun FNS
Absolute, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G, Antecedent = the
wicked indivdual of 1:7, 11, 13, his soul. “[The Soul] as
the centre and transmitter of feelings and perceptions.” (KB, Lexicon,
713)
בּ֑וֹ
Preposition, Locative + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent
= נַפְשׁ֖וֹ as above, in
him. Disjunctive accent.
וְצַדִּ֖יק
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative and Adversative +
Adjective MNS Absolute, Substantival, Subject N, but the
righteous. Grammatically parallel toעֻפְּלָ֔ה .
Disjunctive accent. Forward emphasis.
בֶּאֱמוּנָת֥וֹ
Preposition, Means + Noun FGS Construct + Personal
Pronoun MGS, Subjective G, Antecedent = צַדִּ֖יק, by
means of the faithfulness he exhibits.
“Or ‘loyalty’; or
‘integrity.’ The Hebrew word אֱמוּנָה (’emunah)
has traditionally been translated ‘faith,’ but the term nowhere else refers to
‘belief’ as such. When used of human character and conduct it carries the
notion of ‘honesty, integrity, reliability, faithfulness.’ The antecedent of
the suffix has been understood in different ways. It could refer to God’s
faithfulness, but in this case one would expect a first person suffix (the
original form of the LXX has ‘my faithfulness’ here). Others understand the
‘vision’ to be the antecedent. In this case the reliability of the prophecy is
in view. For a statement of this view, see J. J. M. Roberts, Nahum,
Habakkuk, and Zephaniah (OTL), 111–12. The present translation assumes
that the preceding word ‘[the person of] integrity’ is the antecedent. In this
case the Lord is assuring Habakkuk that those who are truly innocent
will be preserved through the coming oppression and judgment by their godly
lifestyle, for God ultimately rewards this type of conduct. In contrast to
these innocent people, those with impure desires (epitomized by the greedy
Babylonians; see v. 5) will not be able to withstand God’s judgment (v. 4a).”
(NET, loc. cit.)
“אֱמוּנָה does
not denote ‘an honourable character, or fidelity to conviction’ (Hitzig), but
(from ’âman, to be firm, to last) firmness (Ex. 17:12); then, as an
attribute of God, trustworthiness, unchangeable fidelity in the fulfilment of
His promises (Deut. 32:4; Ps. 33:4; 89:34); and, as a personal attribute of
man, fidelity in word and deed (Jer. 7:28; 9:2; Ps. 37:3); and, in his relation
to God, firm attachment to God, an undisturbed confidence in the divine
promises of grace, . . . .” (K&D, loc. cit.)
יִחְיֶֽה׃
QI 3MS, Stative, lives.
“A righteous Israelite who
remained loyal to God’s moral precepts and was humble before the Lord enjoyed
God’s abundant life. To ‘live’ meant to experience God’s blessing by enjoying a
life of security, protection, and fullness. Conversely, an apparently
victorious but proud and perverse Babylonian would die. Faithfulness
(niv marg.) and faith are related. One who trusts in the Lord is one who
relies on Him and is faithful to Him.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
“The New Testament writers quoted
the verse three times (Rom 1:17; Gal 3:11; Heb 10:38). Paul used this idea as
the hallmark of his teaching concerning the primacy of faith in salvation. He
took God’s message to Habakkuk to its final emphasis: those who are judged
righteous as a result of their faith shall live. Habakkuk’s questions supplied
Paul with his beginning and ending point that faith is the key. God recognizes
the faithfulness (faith) of his people and gives life.” (Barker, Habakkuk,
loc. cit.) See Archer & Chirichigno, Old Testament
Quotations, Moody Press, 1983, para. #220.
“The translator of Habakkuk does
not need to worry too much about Paul’s theology. However, he does need to see
what Paul has done, so that he can understand the difference between the
meaning Habakkuk intended and the meaning Paul later drew from these words.
Among Christians, Paul’s teaching is much more familiar than Habakkuk’s, and
translators must therefore be careful not to translate in such a way that they
make Habakkuk sound like Paul! Habakkuk’s own meaning in its original context
must be respected, and not changed to conform to the New Testament application
of his words.” (Clark, D. J., & Hatton, H. A. (1989). A
translator’s handbook on the book of Habakkuk, 9, New York: United Bible
Societies) [Hereafter as Clark & Hatton, Habakkuk]
The promise looks beyond the
temporal future of the Chaldeans and Israelites, and unto a reward that is
eternal. We see how naturally the principle here enunciated is applied by the
apostle to teach the doctrine of justification by faith in Christ.”
(Spence-Jones, Ibid., loc. cit.)
“Habakkuk 2:4 is also cited three
times in the New Testament: Romans 1:17, Galatians 3:11, and Hebrews 10:37–38.
Of the three, Hebrews 10 uses the text in a way closest to its original context
in its call for the reader to persevere with confidence in the face of
suffering and persecution and to do the will of God in order to receive the
salvation which God has promised.” (Ham & Hahlen, Minor Prophets,
145). Joplin, MO: College Press Pub. Co.) [Hereafter as Ham & Hahlen, Minor
Prophets]
5
“The focal assertion of verses 4–5 comprises the positive response to the
vision: But the righteous will live by his faith. The noun
‘righteous’ (צַדִּיק, ṣaddîq)
refers to one who conforms to an ethical standard (Gen 6:9; 15:6; Ezek 3:21);
accordingly, the ‘righteous’ is one who serves Yahweh (Mal 3:18), obeys the
commands of Yahweh (Deut 6:25; Ps 1:1–6; Ezek 18:9; Hos 14:9), remembers the
covenant with Yahweh (Isa 51:1–8), cares for the poor and needy (Job 29:12–15;
Ps 37:21; Prov 29:7), and lives according to the spirit of Yahweh (Isa
32:15–17; Ezek 36:25–27). Habakkuk’s use of ṣaddîq may reflect
this general meaning of the term, or the prophet may use ṣaddîq more
specifically to identify those who are mistreated and oppressed by the wicked
(cf. 1:4, 13), a meaning of the word found elsewhere in the prophetic
literature (Isa 29:20–21; Lam 4:13; Ezek 13:22; Amos 2:6–7; 5:12).” (Ham &
Hahlen, Minor Prophets, 144)
וְאַף֙
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Adverb,
Intensive, and indeed [consider]. “אַף also,
besides, even, intensive clauses.” (GKC, Grammar, 483)
Disjunctive accent.
“V. 5 is closely connected with v.
4a, not only developing still further the thought which is there expressed,
but applying it to the Chaldaean. אַף כִּי does
not mean ‘really if’ (Hitzig and others), even in Job 9:14; 35:14, Ezek. 15:5,
or 1 Sam. 21:6 (see Delitzsch on Job 35:14), but always means ‘still further,’
or ‘yea also, that;’ and different applications are given to it, so that, when
used as an emphatic assurance, it signifies ‘to say nothing of the fact that,’
or when it gives emphasis to the thing itself, ‘all the more because,’ and in
negative sentences ‘how much less’ (e.g., 1 Kings 8:27). In the present
instance it adds a new and important feature to what is stated in v. 4a,
‘And add to this that wine is treacherous;’ i.e., to those who are addicted to
it, it does not bring strength and life, but leads to the way to ruin (for the
thought itself, see Prov. 23:31, 32).’ (K&D, loc. cit.)
כִּֽי־הַיַּ֣יִן
Hypotactic Conjunction, Untranslated Object of a Nominal
Clause + Article, Generic + Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, wine.
“Wine is probably a metaphor for imperialistic success. The more success the Babylonians
experience, the more greedy they become just as a drunkard wants more and more
wine to satisfy his thirst. But eventually this greed will lead to their
downfall, for God will not tolerate such imperialism and will judge the
Babylonians appropriately (vv. 6–20).” (NET, loc. cit.)
בּוֹגֵ֔ד
QAPtc MNS Absolute, Predicate N, [is]
treacherous. Disjunctive accent.
גֶּ֥בֶר
Noun MNS Absolute, Rhetorical Absolute (Casus Pendens
resumed by the subject of יִנְוֶ֑ה below), an .
. . man. Explanatory asyndeton.
יָהִ֖יר
Adjective MNS, Attributive, arrogant.
Disjunctive accent (Tiphchah). NET, loc. cit., dramatically separates these two
words.
וְלֹ֣א
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Negative Adverb, and
not.
יִנְוֶ֑ה
QI 3MS, Progressive I, he does . . . rest.
Disjunctive accent. “[T]o reach an objective, achieve a result.” (KB, Lexicon,
678)
“The meaning of the last verb,
‘dwell,’ is uncertain. Many take it as a denominative of the noun נָוָה (navah, ‘dwelling
place’). In this case it would carry the idea, ‘he does not settle down,’ and
would picture the drunkard as restless (cf. NIV ‘never at rest’; NASB ‘does not
stay at home’). Some relate the verb to an Arabic cognate and translate the
phrase as ‘he will not succeed, reach his goal.’ The Babylonian tyrant is
the proud, restless man described in this line as the last
line of the verse, with its reference to the conquest of the nations, makes
clear. Wine is probably a metaphor for imperialistic success. The more success
the Babylonians experience, the more greedy they become just as a drunkard
wants more and more wine to satisfy his thirst. But eventually this greed will
lead to their downfall, for God will not tolerate such imperialism and will
judge the Babylonians appropriately (vv. 6–20).” (NET, loc. cit.)
“But looking to what follows, this
sentence forms a protasis to v. 6, being written first in an absolute form,
‘He, the widely opened one, etc., upon him will all take up,’ etc. Hirchībh
naphshō, to widen his soul, . . . , to open the mouth (Isa. 5:14), is a
figure used to denote insatiable desire.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
אֲשֶׁר֩
Hypotactic Conjunction, Pronominal Relative MNS, Subject
N, Antecedent = Subject of יִנְוֶ֑ה above, who.
הִרְחִ֨יב
HiPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, has enlarged.
כִּשְׁא֜וֹל
Preposition, Comparative + Noun MGS Absolute, like
Sheol. Forward emphasis.
נַפְשׁ֗וֹ
Noun FAS Construct, A Direct Object + Personal Pronoun
MGS, Possessive G, Antecedent = אֲשֶׁר֩, his
appetite. Disjunctive accent. “Hereנֶפֶשׁ
(nefesh) is understood in a physical sense, meaning ‘throat,’ which in
turn is figurative for the appetite.” (NET, loc. cit.)
וְה֤וּא
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Personal Pronoun MNS,
Subject N, Antecedent = נַפְשׁ֗וֹ, and he.
כַמָּ֙וֶת֙
Preposition, Comparative + Article, Particularizing +
Noun MGS Absolute, like death. Forward emphasis.
וְלֹ֣א
Hypotactic Conjunction, Relative and Adjunctive +
Negative Adverb, also . . . not.
יִשְׂבָּ֔ע
QI 3MS, Stative I, is . . . satisfied. Disjunctive
accent.
וַיֶּאֱסֹ֤ף
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Progressive
I, and gathers.
אֵלָיו֙
Preposition, Terminative + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Reflexive G, Antecedent = Subject of וַיֶּאֱסֹ֤ף, to
himself.
כָּל־הַגּוֹיִ֔ם
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object and functions
adverbially (GKC, Grammar, 415, para. 128.e; KB, Lexicon,
474) + Article, Previous Reference to 1:17 + Noun MGP Absolute, Descriptive
G, all the nations. Disjunctive accent.
וַיִּקְבֹּ֥ץ
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Progressive
I, and collects.
אֵלָ֖יו
Preposition, Terminative + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Reflexive G, Antecedent = Subject of וַיִּקְבֹּ֥ץ
, to himself.
כָּל־הָעַמִּֽים׃
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object and functions
adverbially (GKC, Grammar, 415, para. 128.e; KB, Lexicon,
474)+ Article, Particularizing + Noun MGP Absolute, Descriptive G, all
peoples. Disjunctive accent.
_______________
Verse 1
(A) I will stand on
my guard post
(B) And station myself on the rampart;
(A) And I will keep watch to see what He will speak to
me,
(B) And how I may reply when I am reproved.
- ABAB pattern with B adding to A.
- Habakkuk’s Role – First A/B combination
- Habakkuk’s Expectation – Second A/B
combination.
Verse 2
Then the Lord answered me and
said,
Record the vision
And inscribe it on tablets,
That the one who reads it may run.
- Lines 1 and 2 are semantically related.
- Line 3 represents the effect of the preceding
imperatives.
Verse 3
(A) For the vision is
yet for the appointed time;
(B) It hastens toward the goal and it will
not fail.
(B) Though it tarries, wait for it;
(A) For it will certainly come, it will not
delay.
- The verse is chiastic where A’s and B’s relate
semantically.
- The “vision” (“it”) is the subject of the verse
and repeated 7 times.
Verse 4
Behold, as for the proud one,
His soul is not right within him;
But the righteous will live by his faith.
- Line 1 is explained by line 2.
- “faith” and “faithfulness” translate the same
word. See the notes.
- But in line 3 provides the antithesis of lines
1 and 2.
Verse 5
Furthermore, wine betrays the
haughty man,
So that he does not stay at home.
He enlarges his appetite like Sheol,
And he is like death, never satisfied.
He also gathers to himself all nations
And collects to
himself all peoples.
- Each line has two parts by the disjunctive accents
in the notes.
- Line 3 expands line 2.
Faith In God And His Character Is The Key To Living
In Times
Of Violence And Perverted Justice!
I. Why Is Yahweh
Unresponsive to My Prayers? 1:1-11
II. Yahweh’s Response Concerning Babylon, 2:1-20
A. Habakkuk’s Role and Expectation, 2:1
B. The Vision and General Indictment concerning Babylon,
2-5
C. Five Woes, 6-20
6
“The destruction
of Babylon intimated in God’s comments to Habakkuk was announced in fuller
detail in a song of woe in five stanzas of three verses each (‘woe’ occurs in
vv. 6, 9, 12, 15, 19).” (BKC, loc. cit.)
הֲלוֹא־אֵ֣לֶּה
Interrogative, Rhetorical + Negative Adverb + Demonstrative Pronoun MNP
Absolute, Antecedent = הָעַמִּֽים, will
not these. Expects a “yes!” answer. Forward emphasis.
כֻלָּ֗ם
Noun MNS Construct, Appositional N + Personal Pronoun MGP, Antecedent
= הָעַמִּֽים, all of
them. ”Nevertheless the nations as such, or in pleno, are
not meant, but simply the believers among them, who expect Jehovah to inflict
judgment upon the Chaldaeans, and look forward to that judgment for the
revelation of the glory of God.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
עָלָיו֙
Preposition, Disadvantage + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = אֵלָ֖יו, against him. Forward
emphasis.
מָשָׁ֣ל
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object, a taunt. Forward
emphasis.
יִשָּׂ֔אוּ
QI 3CP, Deliberative , lift up? Disjunctive accent.
וּמְלִיצָ֖ה
Paratactic Conjunction, Epexegetical + Noun FAS Absolute, A Direct Object
in Noun Clause with [יִשָּׂ֔אוּ] implied, that
is, a proverb. Disjunctive accent making a separation from the
following noun.
חִיד֣וֹת
Noun FAP Absolute, A Direct Object (see above), riddles. Copulative asyndeton.
ל֑וֹ
Preposition, Disadvantage + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = עָלָיו֙, against him.
וְיֹאמַ֗ר
Paratactic Conjunction, Relation + QI 3MS, Explanatory I, Indefinite
S, and say.
ה֚וֹי
Exclamation, woe! ”וְיֹאמַר serves, like לֵאמֹר elsewhere, as a direct
introduction to the speech.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
הַמַּרְבֶּ֣ה
Article, Particularizing + HiPtc MNS Absolute, Relative Ptc, Indirect
Object in Noun Clause, to the one who makes plentiful.
לֹּא־ל֔וֹ
Negative Adverb + Preposition, Possessive + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Antecedent = הַמַּרְבֶּ֣ה, [things] not
belonging to him. Disjunctive accent.
עַד־מָתַ֕י
Preposition, Temporal + Interrogative, Rhetorical, how long? Disjunctive
accent. This question stands alone parenthetically and is a dramatic insertion.
See the translations.
וּמַכְבִּ֥יד
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative (See note under עַבְטִֽיט below) + HiPtc MNS Absolute,
Relative Ptc, Indirect Object in Noun Clause, and to the one
who amasses wealth. “Heb ‘and the one who makes himself
heavy [i.e., wealthy] [by] debts.’ Though only appearing in the first line, the
term הוֹי (hoy) is to be
understood as elliptical in the second line.” (NET, loc. cit.)
עָלָ֖יו
Preposition, Advantage+ Personal Pronoun MGS, Reflexive G, Antecedent
= מַכְבִּ֥יד, for his own
benefit.
עַבְטִֽיט׃
Noun MAS Absolute, Adverbial A of Manner, Collective S, with [other
people’s] debts.
“This noun is also dependent upon hōi, since the defined participle which
stands at the head of the cry of woe is generally followed by participles
undefined, as though the former regulated the whole (cf. Isa. 5:20 and 10:1).
At the same time, it might be taken as a simple declaration in itself, though
still standing under the influence of the hōi; in which case הוּא would have to be supplied in
thought, like וְחֹוטֵא in v. 10.
And even in this instance the sentence is not subordinate to the preceding one,
as Luther follows Rashi in assuming (‘and still only heaps much slime upon
himself’); but is co-ordinate, as the parallelism of the clauses and the
meaning of עַבְטִיט require. The ἁπ.
λεγ. עַבְטִיט is
probably chosen on account of the resemblance in sound to מַכְבִּיד, whilst it also covers an enigma or double
entendre. Being formed from עָבַט
(to give a pledge) by the repetition of the last radical,עַבְטִיט signifies
the mass of pledges (pignorum captorum copia: Ges., Maurer, Delitzsch),
not the load of guilt, either in a literal or a tropico-moral sense. The
quantity of foreign property which the Chaldaean has accumulated is represented
as a heavy mass of pledges, which he has taken from the nations like an
unmerciful usurer (Deut. 24:10), to point to the fact that he will be compelled
to disgorge them in due time.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
7
הֲל֣וֹא
Interrogative, Rhetorical + Negative Adverb, will not. Does
double duty. Asyndetic.
פֶ֗תַע
Adverb of Time, suddenly. Disjunctive accent.
יָק֙וּמוּ֙
QI 3CP, Deliberative I, will rise up?
נֹשְׁכֶ֔יךָ
QAPtc MNP, Relative Ptc, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MAP, Antecedent
= עָלָיו֙ above, those
who bite you. The change to the 2nd person is pointed and dramatic.
Disjunctive accent. Play upon words two words with same sounds,
“creditors”/“biters.”
וְיִקְצ֖וּ
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3CP, Deliberative I, and . .
. will wake up? Expects “yes” answer.
מְזַעְזְעֶ֑יךָ
PilPtc MNP, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct Object, Antecedent
= נֹשְׁכֶ֔יךָ), those who
cause you to tremble? Disjunctive accent.
וְהָיִ֥יתָ
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative, Resultative + QPf 2MS, and, as a
result, you will be.
לִמְשִׁסּ֖וֹת
Preposition, Reference + Noun FGP Absolute, for plunder.
לָֽמוֹ׃
Preposition, Advantage + Personal Pronoun MGP, Reflexive, Antecedent
= מְזַעְזְעֶ֑יךָ, for
themselves. Disjunctive accent.
“Will not your debtors suddenly arise? The victimized nations would suddenly
arise in revolt. The debtors (lit., ‘biters’) would unexpectedly strike back.
They would not only get their bite of the stolen goods but also give their
aggressors a good shakedown. Will they not wake up and make you tremble? . . .
. Babylon would become their victim, the victim of the very nations she had
victimized. Babylon who had attacked (cf. 1:6, 8–10) and extorted (1:6, 16)
would now herself be attacked and extorted.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
8
כִּֽי
Hypotactic Conjunction, Conditional Protasis (difficult to differentiate
“condition” and “cause”), since.
אַתָּ֤ה
Personal Pronoun, Emphasis, Antecedent = Subject of וְהָיִ֥יתָ, you.
שַׁלּ֙וֹתָ֙
PiPf 2MS, Constative Pf, you plundered.
גּוֹיִ֣ם
Noun MAP Absolute, A Direct Object, nations.
רַבִּ֔ים
Adjective MAP Absolute, Attributive, many. Disjunctive
accent.
יְשָׁלּ֖וּךָ
PiI 3MP, Future I + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct Object, Antecedent
= אַתָּ֤ה, will plunder you. Conditional
Apodosis (see above).
כָּל־יֶ֣תֶר
Noun MNS Construct, Subject N, functions
adverbially (GKC, Grammar, 415, para. 128.e; KB, Lexicon,
474) + Noun MGS Construct, all the remainder of.
עַמִּ֑ים
Noun MGP Absolute, peoples. Disjunctive accent.
מִדְּמֵ֤י
Preposition, Causal (does double duty) + Noun MGP Construct, because
of the shed blood of.
אָדָם֙
Noun MGS Absolute, Collective S, mankind.
וַחֲמַס־אֶ֔רֶץ
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MGS Construct (dependent on
previous preposition) + Noun MGS Absolute, G of Disadvantage, Collective
S, and [because of] the violence to the lands. Disjunctive
accent.
קִרְיָ֖ה
Noun FGS Absolute, Appositional G and Disadvantage, Collective S, against
the cities. Explanatory asyndeton.
וְכָל־יֹ֥שְׁבֵי
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MGS Construct, Appositional
G + QAPtc MGP Construct, and Disadvantage, and against all
the dwellers.
פ פבָֽהּ׃
Preposition,
Locative + Personal Pronoun FGS, Collective S, Antecedent = קִרְיָ֖ה, in them.
9
Disjunctive asyndeton to continue with the second “Woe!”
ה֗וֹי
Exclamation, woe! Disjunctive accent.
בֹּצֵ֛עַ
QAPtc MNS Absolute, Subject N in Noun Clause, Relative Ptc, the one
who profits.
בֶּ֥צַע
Noun MAS Absolute, A of Manner, by . . . profit.
רָ֖ע
Adjective MAS Absolute, Attributive, unjust.
לְבֵית֑וֹ
Preposition, Advantage + Noun MGS Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Antecedent = בֹּצֵ֛עַ, for the
benefit of his household.
לָשׂ֤וּם
Preposition, Purpose + QInf Construct, to set.
בַּמָּרוֹם֙
Preposition, Locative + Article, Particularizing + Noun MGS Absolute, on
high.
קִנּ֔וֹ
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G,
Antecedent = בֹּצֵ֛עַ, his nest. Disjunctive
accent.
לְהִנָּצֵ֖ל
Preposition, Purpose + NiInf Construct, Ni Reflexive, to save
himself.
מִכַּף־רָֽע׃
Preposition, Separation + Article, Particularizing + Noun MGS Construct +
Adjective MGS Absolute, Substantival Attributive, G of Description, from
the hand marked by adversity. Disjunctive accent. “רָע is not masculine, the evil man; but neuter, adversity,
or
‘the hostile
fate.’” (K&D,
loc. cit.)
10
Explanatory asyndeton.
יָעַ֥צְתָּ
QPf 2MS, Perfective Pf, you have decided.
בֹּ֖שֶׁת
Noun FAS Absolute, A Direct Object, a shameful thing.
לְבֵיתֶ֑ךָ
Preposition, Disadvantage + Noun MGS Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive, Antecedent = Subject of יָעַ֥צְתָּ,
against your household. Disjunctive accent.
קְצוֹת־עַמִּ֥ים
Noun FAP Absolute, A of Apposition to בֹּ֖שֶׁת +Noun
MGP Absolute, Objective G, cutting off of . . . peoples.
רַבִּ֖ים
Adjective MGP Absolute, Attributive, many.
וְחוֹטֵ֥א
Paratactic Conjunction, Resultative + QAPtc MNP Absolute, Predicate N in
Noun Clause, and, as a result, [you are] sinning.
נַפְשֶֽׁךָ׃
Noun MGS Construct, G of Disadvantage + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G,
Antecedent = Subject of יָעַ֥צְתָּ, against
yourself. Disjunctive accent.
11
כִּי־אֶ֖בֶן
Hypotactic Conjunction, Emphatic + Noun FNS Absolute, Subject N, indeed,
a stone.
מִקִּ֣יר
Preposition, Source + Noun MGS Absolute, from the wall. Forward
emphasis.
תִּזְעָ֑ק
QI 2FS, Future I, will cry out.
וְכָפִ֖יס
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, and
a rafter.
מֵעֵ֥ץ
Preposition, Source + Noun MGS Absolute, from the wooden
framework. Forward emphasis.
פ יַעֲנֶֽנָּה׃
QI 3MS, Future I + Personal Pronoun FAS, A Indirect Object, Antecedent
= אֶ֖בֶן, will answer it. Disjunctive
accent.
_______________
Woe 1, Verses 6-8
Verse 6 —
Ridicule
(A) “Will not all
of these take up a taunt-song against him,
(B) Even mockery and insinuations against
him
(A) And say, ‘Woe to him who increases what
is not his
(B) —For how long—And makes himself rich with loans?’
- ABAB parallelism pattern.
- “Will not” = Rhetorical
question expecting “yes” answer.
- Line 2 expands line 1 and
line 4 expands line 3.
- —For how long— = a dramatic
interjection.
Verse 7 —
Rebellion
“Will not your
creditors rise up suddenly,
And those who collect from you awaken?
Indeed, you will become plunder for them.
- “Creditors” is a play on
words—see the notes.
- Cause and effect pattern
between verse 6, lines 3, 4 and verse 7.
- “Collect from you” changed to
“make you tremble” in the notes.
- Creditors, Collectors,
Plunderers = main interplay in the verse.
- Lines 1 and 2 = cause; line 3
= effect.
Verse 8 —
Retaliation
(A) “Because you
have looted many nations
(B) All the remainder of the peoples will loot you—
(A) Because of human bloodshed and
violence done to the land,
(B) To the town and all its inhabitants.”
- ABAB parallel pattern.
- “Because” in line 3 is more
specific: “growing out of ” or “stemming from.”
- Habakkuk’s key word
“Violence” occurs in 1:2, 3, 9; 2:8, 17 twice.
Woe 2, Verses 9-11
Verse 9 — Injustice & Intent
“Woe
to him who gets evil gain for his
house
To put his nest on high,
To be delivered from the hand of calamity!
- “Him who gets” and “evil
gain” = assonance (בֹּצֵ֛עַ בֶּ֥צַע).
- “Evil” and “Calamity” also
are assonant and related (רָ֖ע .
. . רָ֖ע).
- “His nest” illustrates by
imagery “his house.”
Verse 10— Plan
& Problem
“You have devised
a shameful thing for your house
By cutting off many peoples;
So you are sinning against yourself.
- “Your house” repeats from
verse 9.
- “Shameful thing,” “cutting
off,” and “sinning” are semantically related concepts as are “your house”
and “yourself /your life” and sequentially more powerful when read without
the words added by the translators (underlined).
- Lines 1 and 2 = cause; line 3
= effect.
Verse 11 —
Accusation & Agreement
“Surely
the stone will cry out from the wall,”
And the rafter will answer it from
the framework.”
- Grammatically and
semantically parallel clauses.
- Cause (line 1) and effect
(line 2) pattern.
Faith In God And
His Character Is The Key To Living In Times
Of Violence And
Perverted Justice!
I. Why Is Yahweh Unresponsive to My
Prayers? 1:1-11
II. Yahweh’s Response Concerning Babylon, 2:1-20
A. Habakkuk’s Role and
Expectation, 1
B. The Vision and General
Inditement concerning Babylon, 2-5
C. Five Woes Continued,
6-20
12
“The plunder mentioned in the first woe (vv. 6–8)
and the pride exposed in the second woe (vv. 9–11) were both fed by the
sin-sick perversity revealed in the third woe (vv. 12–14).” (BKC, loc. cit.)
ה֛וֹי
Interjection, Woe! The third Woe!
בֹּנֶ֥ה
QAPtc MNS, Relative Ptc, Predicate N in Noun
Clause, [happens to] him who builds.
עִ֖יר
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object, a city.
בְּדָמִ֑ים
Preposition, Means + Noun MGP Absolute, by
bloodshed. Disjunctive accent.
וְכוֹנֵ֥ן
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + PolPf 3MS,
Persistent Pf, and he establishes. The grammatical parallelism
with בֹּנֶ֥ה is broken.
קִרְיָ֖ה
Noun FAS Absolute, A Direct Object, a town.
בְּעַוְלָֽה׃
Preposition, Means + Noun FGS Absolute, by
injustice. Disjunctive accent.
13
Probably a explanatory asyndeton.
הֲל֣וֹא
Interrogative, Rhetorical + Negative Adverb in a
Noun Clause, [is] . . . not. The subject of the ellided copula
is an implied “this” and is proleptic, pointing forward. Ellipsis often
makes the sentence more powerful. The interrogative expects a “yes” answer.
הִנֵּ֔ה
Interjection, Emotional, Behold! “The
NIV leaves out a strong word of the Hebrew text, ‘behold’ (hinnê). This word
calls attention to the text and directs the reader to give special attention.
Waltke and O’Conner point out the use of the word as an exclamation of vivid
immediacy. (Barker, Habakkuk, 338) Also, see KB, Lexicon, 252.
Disjunctive accent.
מֵאֵ֖ת
Preposition, Source + Particle of Proximity (See
BDB, 86), from. See KB, Lexicon, 541.
יְהוָ֣ה
Noun MGS Construct, See the Preposition, Yahweh.
צְבָא֑וֹת
Noun MGP Absolute, G of Description, of
hosts. Disjunctive accent.
וְיִֽיגְע֤וּ
Paratactic Conjunction, Epexegetical (establishing
the subject for the preceding Noun Clause) + QI 3MP, Progressive I, that
. . . labor. “The ו before יִיגְעוּ introduces the declaration of what it is
that comes from Jehovah. הֲלֹוא הִנֵּה (is
it not? behold!) are connected together, as in 2 Chron. 25:26, to point to what
follows as something great that was floating before the mind of the prophet.”
(K&D, loc. cit.) See NASB and ESV.
עַמִּים֙
Noun MNP Absolute, Subject N, peoples.
בְּדֵי־אֵ֔שׁ
Preposition, Specification + Noun MGS Construct +
Noun MGS Absolute, G of Reference, for enough fire.
וּלְאֻמִּ֖ים
Paratactic Conjunction, Epexegetical (See above
note) + Noun MNP Absolute, Subject N, that nations. Compare
the poetic parallelism at the end.
בְּדֵי־רִ֥יק
Preposition, Specification + Noun MGS Construct +
Noun MGS Absolute, G of Reference for nothing.
יִעָֽפוּ׃
QI 3MP, Progressive I, grow weary.
14
The thought in v. 14 is formed after Isa. 11:9, with
trifling alterations, partly substantial, partly only formal. The choice of
the niphal תִּמָּלֵא instead
of the מָלְאָה of Isaiah refers to the
actual fact, and is induced in both passages by the different turn given to the
thought. In Isaiah, for example, this thought closes the description of the
glory and blessedness of the Messianic kingdom in its perfected state. The earth
is then full of the knowledge of the Lord, and the peace throughout all nature
which has already been promised is one fruit of that knowledge. In Habakkuk, on
the other hand, this knowledge is only secured through the overthrow of the
kingdom of the world, and consequently only thereby will the earth be filled
with it, and that not with the knowledge of Jehovah (as in Isaiah), but with
the knowledge of His glory (כְּבֹוד יי׳),
which is manifested in the judgment and overthrow of all ungodly powers (Isa.
2:12–21; 6:3, compared with the primary passage, Num. 14:21). כְּבֹוד יי׳ is ‘the δόξα of Jehovah, which includes His right of
majesty over the whole earth.’” (K&D, loc. cit.)
כִּ֚י
Hypotactic Conjunction, Causal, because. It
may connect with line 1 of verse 13.
תִּמָּלֵ֣א
NI 3FS, Future I, will be filled.
הָאָ֔רֶץ
Article, Particularizing + Noun FAS Absolute,
Subject N, the earth. Disjunctive accent.
לָדַ֖עַת
Preposition, Specification + QInf Construct, with
respect to the knowledge of.
אֶת־כְּב֣וֹד
Particle of Definite Accusative + Noun MAS
Construct, the glory of.
יְהוָ֑ה
Noun MGS Absolute, Possessive G, Yahweh.
כַּמַּ֖יִם
Preposition, Comparative + Article, Generic + Noun
MGP Absolute, as the waters.
יְכַסּ֥וּ
PiI 3MP, Stative I, cover.
עַל־יָֽם׃ ס
Preposition, Locative + Noun MGS Absolute, over
[the] sea.
15
ה֚וֹי
Interjection, Exclamatory, Woe! The
fourth Woe! The 3 lines in this verse demonstrate progressive actions. See
Watson, Wilfred, G.E. Classical Hebrew Poetry, Sheffield, England,
Sheffield Academic Press, Ltd., pp. 173-74, 184. [Hereafter as Watson, Classical
Hebrew Poetry]
מַשְׁקֵ֣ה
HiPtc MNS Construct, Relative Ptc, Subject N of a
Noun Clause, he who causes . . . to drink.
רֵעֵ֔הוּ
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object + Personal
Pronoun MGS, G of Relationship, Antecedent = מַשְׁקֵ֣ה, his
neighbor. Disjunctive accent.
מְסַפֵּ֥חַ
PiPtc MNS Construct, Relative Ptc, Appositional N,
Subject N of a Noun Clause, he who mixes. “The singular is
used with indefinite generality, or in a collective, or speaking more
correctly, a distributive sense. (K&D, loc. cit.) The pronoun on מְעוֹרֵיהֶֽם below justifies this
conclusion.
חֲמָתְךָ֖
Noun FAS Construct, A Direct Object + Personal
Pronoun MGS, G of Possession, Antecedent = מַשְׁקֵ֣ה, your
poison. “Through the suffix חֲמָתְךָ the
woe is addressed directly to the Chaldaean himself,—a change from the third
person to the second, which would be opposed to the genius of our language.”
(K&D, loc. cit.)
וְאַ֣ף
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Adjunctive
Adverb, and also.
שַׁכֵּ֑ר
PiInf Absolute, Relative and a Ptc Substitute,
Appositional N, Subject N of a Noun Clause, [he] who makes drunk. Disjunctive
accent.
לְמַ֥עַן
Preposition, Purpose, in order.
הַבִּ֖יט
HiInf Construct, Verbal of Purpose, to look.
עַל־מְעוֹרֵיהֶֽם׃
Preposition, Locative + Noun MGP Construct +
Personal Pronoun MGP, G of Possession, Antecedent = רֵעֵ֔הוּ, upon
their nakedness. “More so than in other nations, in Israel nakedness
symbolized shame.” (Barker, Habakkuk, loc. cit.) Disjunctive
accent.
16
Resultative asyndeton.
שָׂבַ֤עְתָּ
QPf 2MS, Future Pf, [ so that] you will be
filled.
קָלוֹן֙
Noun MAS Absolute, Adverbial A of Manner, with
shame.
מִכָּב֔וֹד
Preposition, Privative (KB, Lexicon,
598) + Noun MGS Absolute, without glory. Disjunctive accent.
שְׁתֵ֥ה
QImv 2MS, Imv of Command, drink.
גַם־אַ֖תָּה
Adverb, Adjunctive + Personal Pronoun MNS, Subject
N, Antecedent = ךָ- above (verse
15), also you.
וְהֵֽעָרֵ֑ל
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + NiImv 2MS, Ni
Reflexive, Imv of Command, and show your foreskin. Disjunctive
accent.
תִּסּ֣וֹב
QI 3FS, Future I, will return.
עָלֶ֗יךָ
Preposition, Terminative + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Antecedent = ךָ-, upon you.
כּ֚וֹס
Noun FNS Construct, Subject N, [the] cup of.
יְמִ֣ין
Noun FGS Construct, G of description, the
right hand of. “The Lord’s right hand represents his
military power. He will force the Babylonians to experience the same
humiliating defeat they inflicted on others.” (NET, loc. cit.)
יְהוָ֔ה
Noun MGS Absolute, Possessive G, Yahweh. Disjunctive
accent.
וְקִיקָל֖וֹן
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative of Result + Noun
MNS Absolute, Subject N of a Noun Clause, Forward emphasis, and, as a
result, disgrace. “This form of the word, however, is chosen for the
sake of the play upon קִיא קָלֹון,
vomiting of shame, vomitus ignominiae (Vulg.; cf. קִיא צֹאָה in Isa. 28:8), and in order that, when
the word was heard, it should call up the subordinate meaning, which suggests
itself the more naturally, because excessive drinking is followed by vomiting
(cf. Jer. 25:26, 27).” (K&D, loc. cit.)
עַל־כְּבוֹדֶֽךָ׃
Preposition, Addition + Noun MGS Construct +
Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G, Antecedent = ךָ-, will
override your glory. “… will be over thine honour, i.e., will cover
over thine honour or glory.” (K&D, loc. cit.) Disjunctive accent.
17
כִּ֣י
Hypotactic Conjunction, Causal, because.
חֲמַ֤ס
Noun MNS Construct, Subject N of a Noun
Clause, [the] violence [done].
לְבָנוֹן֙
Noun MGS Absolute, G of Disadvantage, against
Lebanon.
יְכַסֶּ֔ךָּ
PiI 3MS, Future I + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct
Object, Antecedent = ךָ-, will cover
[overwhelm] you. Disjunctive accent.
וְשֹׁ֥ד
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MNS
Construct, Subject N, and destruction.
בְּהֵמ֖וֹת
Noun FGP Absolute, Objective G, on the
animals.
יְחִיתַ֑ן
HiI 3MS, Stative I + Personal Pronoun FAP, A Direct
Object, Antecedent = בְּהֵמ֖וֹת, that
terrified them. Disjunctive accent. “יְחִיתַן is
a relative clause, and the subject, shōd, the devastation which
terrified the animals.” (K&D, loc. cit.) The relative אשׁר is implied.
מִדְּמֵ֤י
Preposition, Causal + Noun MGP Construct, because
of [the] bloodshed on. The Preposition does double duty.
אָדָם֙
Noun MGS Absolute, Objective G, mankind.
וַחֲמַס־אֶ֔רֶץ
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MGS
Construct, + Noun MGS Absolute, G of Disadvantage, and [because of the]
violence against [the] land. Disjunctive accent.
קִרְיָ֖ה
Noun FGS Absolute, Asyndetic, G of
Disadvantage and Apposition, against [the] cities. The S is
Collective.
וְכָל־יֹ֥שְׁבֵי
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MGS
Construct, G of Disadvantage and Apposition + QAPtc MGP Construct, Relative
Ptc, Adjectival Attributive, and against all who dwell.
בָֽהּ׃ ס
Preposition, Locative + Personal Pronoun FGS,
Antecedent = קִרְיָ֖ה, Collective S, in
them. “It is also possible for prepositional phrases and even entire
clauses to stand after a construct; these constituents are thus treated as a
single noun (cf. 4.4.1).” (Waltke & O’Connor, Syntax, 155)
_______________
Woe 3, Realism
Verse 12
Woe
to him who builds a city with bloodshed
And founds a town with violence!
·
Grammatical Parallelism.
·
Line 2 interprets line 1.
·
“Violence” is better translated “injustice’ and not
the same word as previously translated “violence.”
Verse
13
Is it
not indeed from the Lord of hosts
That peoples toil for fire,
And nations grow weary for nothing?
·
The rhetorical question expects “yes!”
·
Line 3 parallels and expands line 2.
·
Verse 12 is the cause; verse 13 the effect.
Verse
14
For
the earth will be filled
With the knowledge of the glory of the Lord,
As the waters cover the sea. A simile.
·
Parallels Isaiah 11:9 that focuses on the
millennium.
·
“Glory” is a reference to God’s revealing of
Himself.
·
Line 3 illustrates line 1.
Woe
#4—Retribution
Verse 15
Woe
to you who make your neighbors drink,
Who mix in your venom even to make them drunk
So as to look on their nakedness!
·
Verses 15 & 16 are a cause/effect unit.
·
A progressive set of 3 lines. See the notes.
Verse
16
(A) You
will be filled with disgrace rather than honor.
(B) Now you yourself drink and expose your own nakedness.
(B) The cup in the Lord’s right hand
will come around to you,
(A) And utter disgrace will come upon
your glory.
·
Chiastic with line 4 expanding line 1 and line 3
expanding line 2.
·
“Honor” & “Glory” = Same word. See ESV.
·
“Cup” (line 3) relates to “drink” (line 2) and the
lines parallel verse 15.
Verse 17
(A)
For the violence done to Lebanon will overwhelm you,
(B) And the devastation of its beasts by
which you terrified them,
(A) Because of human bloodshed and violence done to the
land,
(B) To the town and all its inhabitants.
·
ABAB Poetic Pattern where lines 1 and 2 as well as 3
and 4 interrelate.
·
The verb “overwhelm” and noun “cup” (v. 16) have
similar sounds (Assonance) and tie verse 17 to verse 16.
Faith In God And His Character Is The Key To Living
In Times
Of Violence And Perverted Justice!
I. Why
Is Yahweh Unresponsive to My Prayers? 1:1-11
II. Yahweh’s Response Concerning Babylon, 2:1-20
A.
Habakkuk’s Role and Expectation, 1
B. The Vision and General Indictment concerning Babylon, 2-5
C. Five Woes Continued, 6-20
18
“Unlike the former passages, the final woe begins the taunt before the word
‘woe’ is used. While many translators and interpreters rearrange the text to
place ‘Woe to him’ at the beginning of the passage, the text probably preserves
the more effective arrangement. The prophet jumped right into idol worship
without the pronouncement of judgment, giving the reader a sense of urgency and
conveying the prophet’s indignation at the abomination of worshiping ‘lies.’”
(Barker, Habakkuk, 346)
מָֽה־הוֹעִ֣יל
Interrogative Pronoun, Rhetorical Direct Object + HiPf 3MS, Stative
Pf, profits what? “מה can fulfill
any of the major case functions, but it is most common as the direct object of
the verb.” (Waltke & O’Connor, Syntax, 322)
פֶּ֗סֶל
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, an idol. Disjunctive accent.
כִּ֤י
Hypotactic Conjunction, Temporal, when.
פְסָלוֹ֙
QPf 3MS, Constative Pf + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct
Object, Antecedent = פֶּ֗סֶל, carved
it.
יֹֽצְר֔וֹ
QAPtc MNS Construct, Relative Ptc, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MAS, A
Direct Object, Antecedent = פְסָלוֹ֙, he
who shaped it. Disjunctive accent.
מַסֵּכָ֖ה
Noun FAS Absolute, A in Apposition, an image.
וּמ֣וֹרֶה
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + HiPtc FAS Construct, Substantival Ptc,
A in Apposition, and a teacher of.
שָּׁ֑קֶר
Noun MGS Absolute, Objective G, falsehood. Disjunctive
accent.
כִּ֣י
Hypotactic Conjunction, Temporal, when.
בָטַ֞ח
QPf 3MS, Perfective Pf, puts his trust.
יֹצֵ֤ר
QAPtc MNS Absolute, Relative Ptc, Subject N, he who shaped.
יִצְרוֹ֙
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G,
Antecedent = מַסֵּכָ֖ה, The M is agreement
in sense, its shape.
עָלָ֔יו
Preposition, Termination + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = יִצְר, upon it. Modifies בָטַ֞ח. Disjunctive accent.
לַעֲשׂ֖וֹת
Preposition, Result + QInf Construct, resulting in making.
אֱלִילִ֥ים
Noun MGP Absolute, Objective G, idols.
אִלְּמִֽים׃ ס
Adjective MGP, Attributive, speechless.
19
Fifth Woe—Ridiculousness. Explanatory asyndeton.
ה֣וֹי
Interjection, Exclamatory, woe! “The final woe indicates
the total futility of idol worship. The entire woe is in the third person and
indicates the sorrow of one crying out to a god which can neither stand nor
hear.” (Barker, Habakkuk, 348)
אֹמֵ֤ר
QAPtc MNS, Relative Ptc, Subject N in Noun Clause, he who says.
לָעֵץ֙
Preposition, Indirect Object + Noun MGS Absolute, to a piece of
wood.
הָקִ֔יצָה
HiPtc 2FS, Imv of Command, Wake up! Paragogic ה. Disjunctive accent.
ע֖וּרִי
QImv 2FS, Imv of Command, Arise! Disjunctive Asyndeton.
לְאֶ֣בֶן
Preposition, Indirect Object + Noun FGS Construct, a stone.
דּוּמָ֑ם
Adjective FGS, Attributive, speechless. Has an adverbial
option (KB, Lexicon, 217). Disjunctive accent.
ה֣וּא
Personal Pronoun MNS, Emphasis, Antecedent = Subject of following
verb, it. The M gender according to sense is possible since it
refers to both “wood” (M) and “stone” (F). However, since both represent idols
it perhaps best refers toפֶּ֗סֶל in verse
18. The S is collective encompassing both “wood” and “stone” and could be
translated with “they.”
יוֹרֶ֔ה
HiI 3MS, Capability I, it is able to teach? “Though
the Hebrew text has no formal interrogative marker here, the context indicates
that the statement should be taken as a rhetorical question anticipating the
answer, ‘Of course not!’” (so also NIV, NRSV).” (NET, loc. cit.) It also
represents sarcasm (See Bullinger, Figures of Speech,
807). Disjunctive accent.
הִנֵּה־ה֗וּא
Interjection, Exclamatory + Personal Pronoun MNS, Functioning as a Copula
in a Noun Clause, Subject N, behold! It is.
תָּפוּשׂ֙
QPPtc MNS Absolute, Predicate N, overlaid.
זָהָ֣ב
Noun MAS Absolute, A of Material, with gold.
וָכֶ֔סֶף
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Noun MAS Absolute, and with
silver. Disjunctive accent.
וְכָל־ר֖וּחַ
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative Emphatic + Noun MNS Construct, Subject N +
Noun FGS Absolute, G of Reference (See KB, Lexicon, 474), indeed,
. . . any breath. “‘There is no breath in it at all’ would more
adequately reflect the sense.” (Barker, Habakkuk, 349)
אֵ֥ין
Negative Adverb, is not. A quasi-copula function.
“The fact that אֵין (like אַ֫יִן) always includes the idea of a verb (is
not, was not, &c.) led finally to such a predominance of the verbal
element.” (GKC, Grammar, 481)
בְּקִרְבּֽוֹ׃
Preposition, Locative + Noun MGS Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Antecedent = פֶּ֗סֶל, in its inward
parts. Disjunctive accent.
20
“The last verse of this stanza is unique. In the other four ‘woe’ stanzas
each concluding verse starts in the Hebrew with ‘for’ (kî, vv. 8, 11, 14, 17).
However, verse 20 opens with but.’” (BKC, loc. cit.)
וַֽיהוָ֖ה
Paratactic Conjunction, Adversative + Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N in Noun
Clause, but Yahweh [is].
בְּהֵיכַ֣ל
Preposition, Locative + Noun MGS Construct, in the temple.
קָדְשׁ֑וֹ
Noun MGS Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS, Descriptive G, Antecedent
= יהוָ֖ה, marked by His holiness. Disjunctive
accent.
הַ֥ס
Interjection, Exclamation, keep silent!
מִפָּנָ֖יו
Preposition, Locative + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent = יהוָ֖ה, before Him.
כָּל־הָאָֽרֶץ׃ פ
Noun MNS Construct, Vocative N + Article, Particularizing + Noun FGS
Absolute, G of Reference, all the earth. “כֹּל preceding a determinate noun expressing a unit.”
(KB, Lexicon, 474)
_______________
Verse 18
(A) What
profit is the idol when its maker has carved it,
(B) Or an image, a teacher of
falsehood?
(A) For its maker trusts in his own handiwork
(B) When he fashions speechless idols.
- ABAB parallel pattern.
- “Or” was added in line 2 but detracts from
the poetic power of the line.
- Line 2 interprets “idol” in line 1.
- Line 1--“Idol” and “carved” = Assonance,
same consonants (פּסל/פסל).
- Line 3--“Maker” and “handiwork” = Assonance same
consonants (יצר/יצר) but different
vowels.
- Line 4 parallels line 3 with semantic parallels
between “maker” and “fashions” and “speechless idols” and “handiwork.”
Verse 19
Woe to him who
says to a piece of wood, ‘Awake!’ To a mute stone, ‘Arise!’
And that is your teacher?
Behold, it is overlaid with gold and silver,
And there is no breath at all inside it.
- Line 1 has an internal chiasmus (in
the Hebrew text): A (wood), B (awake), B (arise), A (stone).
- Line 2 involves sarcasm: two words
“they teach?” See the notes.
- Line 3 emphasizes the external whereas
line 4 the internal.
- Line 4: “No breath” explains the sarcasm of
line 2.
Verse 20
But the Lord is
in His holy temple.
Let all the earth be silent before Him.
- These lines are cause and effect.
Faith
In God And His Character Is The Key To Living In Times
Of Violence And Perverted Justice!
I. Why Is Yahweh Unresponsive
to My Prayers? 1:1-11
II. Yahweh’s Response
Concerning Babylon, 2:1-20
III. Habakkuk’s Prayer, 3:1-19
A. Fear
and Revival, 1-2
B. Theophany, 3-15
1. Yahweh Appears, 3-7
1
“In both form and content this prayer differs from the two
previous chapters. In these Yahweh and his prophet had carried on a dialogue in
the form of complaint alternating with oracle, where God’s sovereignty and
judgment became apparent with a declaration through a massaʾ,
‘oracle.’ Here, in lyric verse applicable to public worship, ch. 3 describes a
theophany as the prophet preaches a sermon in the shape of a hymn composed of
an amalgam of elements. As such it is unparalleled; in it the prophet extols the
Lord who is arriving to fight and to conquer.” (Eszenyei Széles, M. (1987). Wrath and mercy: a commentary on the books of Habakkuk and
Zephaniah (pp. 42–43). Grand Rapids; Edinburgh: Eerdmans;
Handsel Press. [Hereafter as Szeles, Wrath and Mercy]
“Despite the arguments about change of style and a separate
title, the third chapter fits well in the flow of the book. The new style fits
the new subject, just as the shift from the dialogue in chapter 1 to the dirge
in chapter 2 indicated a changing emphasis. Furthermore, the title in 3:1
provides a clear break in the change, as “the ramparts” announced the shift at
chapter 2.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
תְּפִלָּ֖ה
Noun FNS Absolute, N Absolute, a prayer.
לַחֲבַקּ֣וּק
Preposition, Agent + Noun MGS construct, by
Habakkuk.
הַנָּבִ֑יא
Article, Particularizing + Noun MGS Absolute, G in
Apposition, the prophet. Disjunctive accent.
עַ֖ל
Preposition, Standard, in accordance with.
שִׁגְיֹנֽוֹת׃
Noun FGP Absolute, See Preposition, Shigionoth. “The
Hebrew text adds עַל שִׁגְיֹנוֹת (’al
shigyonot, ‘upon [or, ‘according to’] shigyonot’). The meaning
of this word is uncertain. It may refer to the literary genre of the prayer or
to the musical style to be employed when it is sung. The NEB leaves the term
untranslated; several other modern English versions transliterate the term into
English, sometimes with explanatory notes (NASB, NRSV ‘according to
Shigionoth’; NIV ‘On shigyonoth’).” (NET loc. cit.)
2
Copulative Asyndeton exhibiting the
contents of the prayer.
יְהוָ֗ה
Noun MNS Absolute, V Direct Address, O Yahweh.
שָׁמַ֣עְתִּי
QPf 1CS, Pf of Past Perfect State, I have heard.
שִׁמְעֲךָ֮
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object and Cognate A +
Personal Pronoun MGS, Objective G, Antecedent = יְהוָ֗ה, [the]
report about you. “This report about Yahweh is called ‘thy report,’
but the suffix is not the subject of the verbal root. It does not describe an
account of himself given by God in an oracle; it is a report about God. It is
best to identify this ‘report’ with the recital in vv 3–7.” (Anderson, Habakkuk, 276)
יָרֵאתִי֒
QPf 1CS, Pf of Present Perfect State, I fear.
Asyndetic. Disjunctive accent. The LXX adds the conjunction (וְ) with no Hebrew MSS support indicated. The Asyndeton adds
force to the verse.
יְהוָ֗ה
Noun MNS Absolute, V Direct Address, O
Yahweh. Disjunctive accent.
פָּֽעָלְךָ֙
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object, Collective S +
Personal Pronoun MGS, Subjective G, Antecedent = יְהוָ֗ה, your
works. Disjunctive accent but the translations differ: disjunctive
(ESV, LEB, NET); conjunctive (NASB, NKJV).
“The ‘work’ or ‘works’ of God can describe almost anything
he does—works of creation, judgment, and redemption. In Hab 1:5, this language
refers to an impending deed. (Anderson, Habakkuk, 276)
בְּקֶ֤רֶב
Preposition, Temporal + Noun MGS Construct, in
[the] midst of. Forward emphasis.
שָׁנִים֙
Noun MGP Absolute, Partitive G, years.
חַיֵּ֔יהוּ
PiImv 2MS, Imv of Request + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct
Object, Antecedent = פָּֽעָלְךָ֙, revive
it. Disjunctive accent.
“Based on the work of God in the past, the prophet called
on God to ‘renew’ his deeds in the present day. ‘In our day’ and ‘in our time’
translate identical Hebrew expressions that begin their respective clauses,
which call on God to renew his work and to make his deeds known ‘in the midst
of years,’ a reference to the prophet’s time period.” (Barker, Habakkuk,
356)
בְּקֶ֥רֶב
Preposition, Temporal + Noun MGS Construct, in
[the] midst of. Forward emphasis. Asyndetic. Most equate this
with Habakkuk’s day.
שָׁנִ֖ים
Noun MGP Absolute, Partitive G, years.
תּוֹדִ֑יעַ
HiI 2MS, I of Injunction, may you make known. Disjunctive
accent. The I is a “non-perfective of injunction express[ing] the speaker’s
will in a positive request or command.” (Waltke & O’Connor, Syntax, 509)
בְּרֹ֖גֶז
Preposition, Manner + Noun MGS Absolute, in anger. Forward
emphasis.
רַחֵ֥ם
PiInf Absolute, Inf of Purpose, to show
compassion. Forward emphasis.
תִּזְכּֽוֹר׃
QI 2MS, I of Injunction, may you remember.
3
“God answered the prayer in verse two with a theophany in
the following verses (Hab 3:3–15). ‘The passage forms the most extensive and
elaborate theophany to be found in the Old Testament.’ [quoted in
Achtemeier, Nahum–Malachi, 56.] A theophany describes an appearance
of God in great power and glory, often looking to the events of the exodus and
the giving of the law on Mount Sinai.” (Barker, Habakkuk, 358)
“In vv. 3–15 there is a mixture of eleven prefixed verbal
forms (without vav [ו]
consecutive or with vav conjunctive), sixteen suffixed forms,
and three prefixed forms with vav consecutive. All of the
forms are best taken as indicating completed action from the speaker’s
standpoint (all of the prefixed forms being regarded as preterites). The forms
could be translated with the past tense, but this would be misleading, for this
is not a mere recital of God’s deeds in Israel’s past history. Habakkuk here
describes, in terms reminiscent of past theophanies, his prophetic vision of a
future theophany (see v. 7, ‘I saw’). From the prophet’s visionary standpoint
the theophany is ‘as good as done.’ This translation uses the English present
tense throughout these verses to avoid misunderstanding. A similar strategy is
followed by the NEB; in contrast note the NIV and NRSV, which consistently use
past tenses throughout the section, and the NASB, which employs present tenses
in vv. 3–5 and mostly past tenses in vv. 6–15.” (NET, loc. cit.)
“As Moses depicts the appearance of the Lord at Sinai as a
light shining from Seir and Paran, so does Habakkuk also make the Holy One
appears thence in His glory; but apart from other differences, he changes the
preterite בָּא (Jehovah came from
Sinai) into the future יָבֹוא, He will come, or
comes, to indicate at the very outset that he is about to describe not a past,
but a future revelation of the glory of the Lord. This he sees in the form of a
theophany, which is fulfilled before his mental eye; hence יָבֹוא does not describe what is future, as being
absolutely so, but is something progressively unfolding itself from the present
onwards, which we should express by the present tense.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
אֱל֙וֹהַ֙
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, God. “The
coming one is called Eloah (not Jehovah, as in Deut. 33:2, and the imitation in
Judg. 5:4), a form of the name Elohim which only occurs in poetry in the
earlier Hebrew writings, which we find for the first time in Deut. 32:15, where
it is used of God as the Creator of Israel, and which is also used here to
designate God as the Lord and Governor of the whole world. Eloah, however,
comes as the Holy One (qâdōsh), who cannot tolerate sin (Hab. 1:13), and who
will judge the world and destroy the sinners (vv. 12–14).” (K&D, loc. cit.)
Explanatory Asyndeton and the beginning of the Epiphany of
verses 3-15.
מִתֵּימָ֣ן
Preposition, Separation + Noun MGS Absolute, from
Teman. Forward emphasis.
יָב֔וֹא
QI 3MS, Progressive I, comes. Disjunctive
accent. On this and other verbs see the above notes.
וְקָד֥וֹשׁ
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + Adjective MNS
Absolute, Substantival, Subject N in Noun Clause, and the Holy One
[comes].
מֵֽהַר־פָּארָ֖ן
Preposition, Separation + Noun MGS Construct + Noun MGS
Absolute, from the mountain of Paran.
“Teman is associated with
Edom (Jer 49:7–8, 20; Ezek 25:13; Amos 1:12; Obad 9), and Paran refers to a
mountain range in the Sinai Peninsula to the south of Judah (Num 10:12; 13:3,
26; 1 Sam 25:1). These places represent points in the route by which Yahweh
leads the covenant nation from Sinai to Canaan in the exodus. Just as Yahweh
has led them into Canaan and enables them to gain possession of the land,
Yahweh now is seen coming again in judgment. In view of 2:20, the coming forth
from these points in the vicinity of Edom rather than from the heavenly temple
is striking. Yahweh begins this approach not in heaven, but at specific sites
on earth. This affirms that the manifestation of Yahweh’s character will not
merely be a theoretical proposition, but will take place in time and space.”
(Ham & Hahlen, Minor Prophets, 158-59)
סֶ֑לָה
Interjection, Exclamatory, Selah. Disjunctive
accent. “The word Selâh does not form part of the subject-matter of
the text, but shows that the music strikes in here when the song is used in the
temple, taking up the lofty thought that God is coming, and carrying it out in
a manner befitting the majestic appearance, in the prospect of the speedy help
of the Lord. The word probably signified elevatio, from sâlâh = sâlal,
and was intended to indicate the strengthening of the musical accompaniment, by
the introduction, as is supposed, of a blast from the trumpets blown by the priests,
corresponding therefore to the musical forte.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
כִּסָּ֤ה
PiPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, covers. See notes
at יָב֔וֹא above.
שָׁמַ֙יִם֙
Noun MAP Absolute, A Direct Object, [the] heavens.
הוֹד֔וֹ
Noun MNS Construct, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive, Antecedent = קָד֥וֹשׁ, his
majesty. Disjunctive accent.
וּתְהִלָּת֖וֹ
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Noun FNS Construct,
Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G, Antecedent = קָד֥וֹשׁ, and his praise. Forward
emphasis. The translations differ as to the syntax: subject or object.
“Grammatically considered, תְּהִלָּתֹו is
the accusative governed by מָלְאָה,
and הָאָרֶץ is the subject.” (K&D,
loc. cit.) The NASB, ESV, NKJV has earth as subject and praise as object; but
the NET, LEB, NIV has praise as the subject. The parallelism, see below,
appears to have praise as subject and earth as object.
מָלְאָ֥ה
QPf 3FS, Persistent Pf, fills. See notes
at יָב֔וֹא above.
הָאָֽרֶץ׃
Article, Particularizing + Noun FAS Absolute, A Direct
Object, the earth.
4
A direct connection with the previous verse. “The prophet
indicated a progressive quality to God’s appearance by comparing His splendor
to a sunrise. The heavens are first tinted with early rays of the hidden sun,
then the earth is illuminated as the ball of fire appears over the horizon, and
finally everything is flooded with brilliant, glorious light.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
See the notes that follow.
וְנֹ֙גַהּ֙
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Noun FNS Absolute, See
under תִּֽהְיֶ֔ה, Subject N, and
brightness. Forward emphasis.
כָּא֣וֹר
Preposition, Comparative + Article, Particularizing + Noun
FGS Absolute, like the lightning. See KB, Lexicon, 24.
“Heb ‘[His] radiance is like light.’ Some see a reference to sunlight, but the
Hebrew word אוֹר (’or) here refers to
lightning, as the context indicates (see vv. 4b, 9, 11). The word also refers
to lightning in Job 36:32 and 37:3, 11, 15.” (NET, loc. cit.)
תִּֽהְיֶ֔ה
QI 3FS, Progressive I, is. See notes at יָב֔וֹא above. Disjunctive accent. “The noun [וְנֹ֙גַהּ֙] is not necessarily masculine, making
discord with the verb . . . ; the gender of some Hebrew nouns is indeterminate,
being now masculine, now feminine; and BDB accepts Hab 3:4 as evidence that
nōgah is feminine.” (Andersen, Habakkuk, 295) See BDB, Lexicon,
618.
קַרְנַ֥יִם
Noun FND Absolute, Appositional N to וְנֹ֙גַהּ֙, rays. KB, Lexicon,
1145. Explanatory Asyndeton and Forward emphasis.
מִיָּד֖וֹ
Preposition, Source + Noun FGS Construct + Personal Pronoun
MGS, Possessive, Antecedent = קָד֥וֹשׁ, from
his hand.
ל֑וֹ
Preposition, Possessive + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive
G, Antecedent = קָד֥וֹשׁ verse), belonging
to him. Disjunctive accent. The redundant use of the pronoun is
ignored by the translations.
וְשָׁ֖ם
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Adverb of Place, and
there [is].
חֶבְי֥וֹן
Noun MNS Construct, Predicate N in Noun Clause, the
covering of.
עֻזֹּֽה׃
Noun FGS, G of Description + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive, his power.
“God’s radiance is both
emanating and concealing. It reveals His glory but veils His power. It is easy
to forget that the light and warmth which showers the earth with blessing comes
from a ball of fire that could consume the globe in a moment. So God’s power is
hidden in His glory. His revelation is restrained lest it consume its
beholders.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
5
Copulative Asyndeton.
לְפָנָ֖יו
Compounded Preposition, Locative + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Antecedent = קָד֥וֹשׁ, before
him. Forward emphasis.
יֵ֣לֶךְ
QI 3MS, Progressive I, See notes at יָב֔וֹא above., goes forth.
דָּ֑בֶר
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, plague. Disjunctive
accent.
וְיֵצֵ֥א
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + QI 3MS, Progressive
I, and . . . goes forth.
רֶ֖שֶׁף
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, plague. See
KB, Lexicon, 1297. “Because of parallelism with the previous
line, the meaning ‘pestilence’ is favored for רֶשֶׁף (reshef)
here, but usage elsewhere suggests a destructive bolt of fire may be in view.
See BDB 958 s.v. . . . There are mythological echoes here, for in
Canaanite literature the god Resheph aids Baal in his battles. See J. Day, “New
Light on the Mythological Background of the Allusion to Resheph in Habakkuk III
5,” VT 29 (1979): 353–55.” (NET, loc. cit.)
לְרַגְלָֽיו׃
Preposition, Locative + Noun MGP Construct + Personal
Pronoun MGS, Possessive G, Antecedent = קָד֥וֹשׁ, at
his feet.
6
Copulative Asyndeton. “The
prophet now speaks of the effect of God’s presence on the world. The
description mingles language appropriate to a thunderstorm with language
appropriate to an earthquake. This kind of mixture is acceptable in Hebrew
poetry, which sees God’s presence in all the major events in the world of
nature.” (Clark, D. J., & Hatton, H. A. (1989). A translator’s
handbook on the book of Habakkuk (p. 120). New York: United Bible
Societies.) [Hereafter as Clark & Hatton, Habakkuk]
“Earlier commentators could not accept the authenticity of
all five colons in v 6. The last colon attracted the most suspicion. Wade’s
(1929:210) comment is typical of the older criticism: ‘The line is isolated,
and is either the addition of a copyist, or else is part of a couplet of which one
line is missing.’ Nowadays it is taken for granted that the pentacolon was part
of the Hebrew poets’ repertoire (Watson 1984a:187–88).” (Anderson, Habakkuk, 307).
עָמַ֣ד׀
QPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, he stands. See
notes at יָב֔וֹא above. On the ׀ (paseq, where 2 words are similar)
see GKC, 59, footnote 2 and Scott, William R. A
Simiplified Guide to BHS, 3rd edition, 5 (category 2).
וַיְמֹ֣דֶד
Paratactic Conjunction, Copulative + PoelI 3MS, Progressive
I, and he caused to shudder. The poel is equivalent to piel
(Waltke & O’Connor, Syntax, para. 21.2.3a). See KB, Lexicon, 555;
NET, loc. cit.
“Moreover, the choice of the poel, instead of the piel,
would still remain unexplained, and the parallelism of the clauses would be
disregarded. We must therefore follow the Chaldee, Ges., Delitzsch, and others,
who take מֹדֵד as the poel of מוּד = מוּט, to set in a reeling motion. It is only
with this interpretation that the two parallel clauses correspond, in which יַתֵּר, the hiphil of נָתַר,
to cause to shake or tremble, answers to יְמֹדֵד.
This explanation is also required by what follows.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
אֶ֗רֶץ
Noun FAS Absolute, A Direct Object, the
earth. Disjunctive accent. First colon (rebia accent).
רָאָה֙
QPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, he looks. See
notes at יָב֔וֹא above. Copulative Asyndeton.
וַיַּתֵּ֣ר
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + HiI 3MS, Progressive
I, and he causes . . . to jump. KB, Lexicon, 736.
גּוֹיִ֔ם
Noun MAP Absolute, A Direct Object, nations. Disjunctive
accent. Second colon (zaqep parvum accent).
וַיִּתְפֹּֽצְצוּ֙
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + HitpoelI 3MP,
Progressive and Reciprocal I, See notes at יָב֔וֹא above,
and . . . shattered themselves in pieces. See Waltke &
O’Connor, Syntax, para. 21.2.3a.
הַרְרֵי־עַ֔ד
Noun MNP Construct, Subject N + Noun MGS Absolute,
Attributive G, everlasting mountains. Disjunctive accent. See
KB, Lexicon, 786. Third colon (zaqep parvum accent).
שַׁח֖וּ
QPf 3CP, Persistent Pf, See notes at יָב֔וֹא above, sink down. Copulative asyndeton.
גִּבְע֣וֹת
Noun FNP Construct, Subject N, hills.
עוֹלָ֑ם
Noun MGS Absolute, Attributive G, ancient. Disjunctive
accent. Fourth colon (Athnach accent).
“הַרְרֵי־עַד (= הַרְרֵי קֶדֶם, Deut. 33:15) in parallelism with גִּבְעֹות עֹולָם are the primeval mountains, as being
the oldest and firmest constituents of the globe, which have existed from the
beginning (מִנִּי עַד, Job 20:4), and were
formed at the creation of the earth (Ps. 90:2; Job 15:7; Prov. 8:25).”
(K&D, loc. cit.)
הֲלִיכ֥וֹת
Noun FNP Construct, Subject N in Noun Clause, paths. Copulative Asyndeton.
עוֹלָ֖ם
Noun MGS Absolute, Attributive G, ancient.
לֽוֹ׃
Preposition, Possession + Personal Pronoun MGS, Antecedent
= Subject of יַּתֵּ֣ר, his. Fifth
colon (Silluq accent).
7
Copulative Asyndeton. “Verse 7 takes up
the theme of the second line of verse 6 and speaks of the effect of God’s
presence on specific peoples. There is no justification for starting a new
paragraph at this point, as TEV does.” (Clark & Hatton, Habakkuk,
121)
“While v. 6 generally alludes to the shaking of the nations
when the Lord manifests himself, v. 7 defines the areas more closely. It
alludes to the inhabited areas of Cushan and Midian, those habitable areas
nearest to Sinai on the Arabian steppes close by the Red Sea. The prophet thus
sees that ‘the tents of Cushan stand under judgment’ (tahat ʾawen raʾiti
ʾohole kushan), ‘and the curtains of the land of Midian tremble.’ The text
is irretrievably damaged, however, leaving us with problems of interpretation.
Nevertheless, seen in connection with the preceding verses, this verse means
the dismay of the region’s inhabitants at the mere manifestation of the Lord as
he arrives for judgment.” (Eszenyei Széles, M. (1987). Wrath and mercy: a
commentary on the books of Habakkuk and Zephaniah (pp. 49–50). Grand
Rapids; Edinburgh: Eerdmans; Handsel Press.) [Hereafter as Szeles, Wrath & Mercy)
“Witnesses to God’s appearance at the Exodus and in the
wilderness wanderings were Cushan and Midian, nations that lay on either side
of the Red Sea (or Cushan may be another name for Midian). God’s wondrous acts
at the Red Sea (when He led His people from Egyptian captivity) threw
neighboring nations into terror and they experienced distress (fear) and
anguish. Other nations too heard of God’s mighty acts and were in fear (Ex.
15:14–16; Deut. 2:25; Josh. 2:9; 5:1). Reference to the people’s tents and
dwellings (lit., “tent hangings”) seems to emphasize their precarious state. If
the mountains melted away, what hope was there for those who huddled under
canvas?” (BKC, loc. cit.)
תַּ֣חַת
Preposition, Locative (metaphorically), under. Forward
emphasis.
אָ֔וֶן
Noun FGS Absolute, trouble. Disjunctive
accent.
רָאִ֖יתִי
QPf 1CS, Certitude Pf, I see in my mind. A
psychological portrayal of the future. See Arnold, Bill T. and John H.
Choi, A Guide to Biblical Hebrew Syntax. New York: Cambridge
University Press, 2003, 55 [Hereafter as Arnold & Choi, Guide to
Biblical Hebrew Syntax]; Williams, Ronald J., Hebrew Syntax, 2nd ed,
para. 165 [Hereafter as Williams, Syntax]; Waltke &
O’Connor, Syntax, 490, labeled “accidental” pf.
אָהֳלֵ֣י
Noun MAP Construct, A Direct Object, the tents of.
כוּשָׁ֑ן
Noun MGS, G of Reference, Cushan. Disjunctive
accent.
יִרְגְּז֕וּן
QI 3MP, Progressive I, in motion. Copulative asyndeton. See
notes at יָב֔וֹא above.
יְרִיע֖וֹת
Noun FAP Construct, A Direct Object, the tent
curtains of.
אֶ֥רֶץ
Noun FGS Construct, G of Reference, the land of.
מִדְיָֽן׃ ס
Noun FGS Absolute, G of Reference, Midian.
_______________
Verses 1-2
A prayer of Habakkuk the prophet, according to Shigionoth.
(A) LORD, I have heard the report about You and I
fear.
(B) O LORD, revive Your work in the midst of the years,
(B) In the midst of the years make it known;
(A) In wrath remember mercy.
·
The initial line is not part
of the poetic development.
·
A Chiastic development.
·
Line 1 “and” is not in the
text.
·
The versions and
interpretations differ at where the thoughts break.
Verses 3-4
(A) God comes from Teman,
(B) And the Holy One from Mount Paran. Selah.
(A) His splendor covers the heavens,
(B) And the earth is full of His
praise.
·
ABAB
parallel lines with (B) expanding (A).
·
Lines 1 and 2 are
grammatically parallel with an ellipsis.
·
Lines 3 and 4 are chiastic:
A=covers the heavens, B=his splendor, B=his praise, A=fills the earth.
His radiance is like the sunlight;
He has rays flashing from His hand,
And there is the hiding of His power.
·
Radiance, sunlight, rays are related
concepts.
·
Lines 2 and 3 have no verb (ellipses)
Verses 5-7
Before Him goes pestilence,
And plague comes after Him.
·
“Pestilence” and “plague”
are semantically related (see the notes).
(A) He stood and surveyed the earth;
(B) He looked and startled the nations.
(A) Yes, the perpetual mountains were
shattered,
(B) The ancient hills collapsed.
His ways are everlasting.
·
ABAB poetic pattern.
·
Assonance in line 1 (amad “stood” and madad “surveyed”).
·
Line 2 interprets line 1
(see the notes); grammatically parallel.
·
Lines 3 and 4 are
grammatically parallel and semantically related.
·
Line 5 (“are” added) sums up
lines 1-4 with verbs (1-2) and effects (3-4).
I saw the tents of Cushan under distress,
The tent curtains of the land of Midian
were trembling.
·
The lines are semantically
related with line 2 interpreting line 1.
Faith In
God And His Character Is The Key To Living In Times
Of Violence And Perverted Justice!
I.
Why Is Yahweh Unresponsive to My Prayers? 1:1-11
II. Yahweh’s Response Concerning Babylon, 2:1-20
III. Habakkuk’s Prayer, 3:1-19
A. Fear
and Revival, 1-2
B. Theophany,
3-15 (Continued)
8
“This section of
the ode is introduced in verse 8 by a series of questions that serve as a
literary interruption to give life and vitality to the message and to provoke
the reader to think about its implications. The questions are in a poetic style
that expects no answer. They are thought-questions.” (BKC, loc. cit.) Some
commentators suggest that the answer comes at verse 13 as the reason for
Yahweh’s coming in verses 3ff.
הֲבִנְהָרִים֙
Interrogative + Preposition, Disadvantage + Noun MGP Absolute, is .
. . against the rivers. Forward emphasis.
חָרָ֣ה
QPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, kindling wrath? See NET note at
verse 3.
יְהוָ֔ה
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, Yahweh. Some translations
see this as vocative (ESV, NKJV). Disjunctive accent.
אִ֤ם
Disjunctive Particle (continuing הֲ above), or.
בַּנְּהָרִים֙
Preposition, Disadvantage + Article, Previous Reference + Noun MGP
Absolute, against the rivers. Forward emphasis.
אַפֶּ֔ךָ
Noun MNS Construct, Predicate N in Noun Clause + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive G, Antecedent = Yahweh, [is] your anger. Disjunctive
accent.
אִם־בַּיָּ֖ם
Disjunctive Particle (continuing הֲ above)
+ Preposition, Disadvantage + Article, Particularizing + Noun FGS
Absolute, or . . . against the sea?
עֶבְרָתֶ֑ךָ
Noun FNS Construct, Subject N in Noun Clause + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive G, Antecedent = יְהוָ֔ה, [is]
your rage. Disjunctive accent.
כִּ֤י
Hypotactic Conjunction, Resultative, that. “explaining and
assigning the reason for the previous question.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
תִרְכַּב֙
QI 2MS, Persistent I, you ride. See NET note at verse 3.
עַל־סוּסֶ֔יךָ
Preposition, Locative + Noun MGP Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive G, Antecedent = יְהוָ֔ה, upon
your horses. Disjunctive accent.
מַרְכְּבֹתֶ֖יךָ
Noun FGP Construct, G in Apposition + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive
G, that is, your chariots of. The pronoun breaks into the
construct chain (see Waltke & O’Connor, Syntax, 140).
יְשׁוּעָֽה׃
Noun FGS Absolute, G of Description, victory. The term
occurs in a warfare motif and can refer to deliverance or victory. See NET,
NIV, LEB, NRSV, HCSB. “[Yahweh’s] motive was to destroy His enemies and deliver
His people. God was seen as a victor riding forth with His horses (cf. Hab.
3:15) and chariots in majestic power.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
9
“The warfare motif continues to develop. In general terms, this verse
continues to describe the Lord’s activity in the storm by using symbolic
language.” (Clark & Hatton, Habakkuk, 125)
עֶרְיָ֤ה
Noun FAS Absolute, Adverbial A of Manner, naked. Forward
emphasis. “To strengthen the thought, the noun עֶרְיָה is
written before the verb instead of the inf. abs. (cf. Mic. 1:11).” (K&D,
loc. cit.)
תֵעוֹר֙
NiI 2MS, Persistent I, is unsheathed. See NET note at
verse 3.
קַשְׁתֶּ֔ךָ
Noun FNS Absolute, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G,
Antecedent = יְהוָ֔ה, your
bow. Disjunctive accent.
שְׁבֻע֥וֹת
Noun FNP Construct, Subject N in Noun Clause, oaths [are
given]. Both the syntax and translations here are guesses in trying to
make sense of the words. “With so many possibilities to be found in reputable
translations (and many other suggestions in scholarly writings), how are
translators to decide what to do? Their first and most important duty is to say
something that makes sense.” (Clark & Hatton, Habakkuk, 126).
“The next clause, שְׁבֻעֹות מַטֹּות אֹמֶר,
is very obscure, and has not yet been satisfactorily explained.” K&D, loc.
cit.) Note the following:
· according to the oaths of the
tribes, even thy word (KJV)
· Oaths were sworn over Your arrows
(NKJV)
· The oaths to the tribes were a sure
word (RV)
· The rods of chastisement were sworn
(NASB)
· Sworn are the rods of the word
(NJPS)
· Oaths were sworn over thine arrows
(NKJV)
· Sated were the arrows at your
command (NRSV)
· and charge your quiver with arrows
(REB)
· filled with arrows is your quiver
(NAB)
· You sated the shafts of your quiver
(Hiebert 1986)
· Arrows in abundance thou didst let
whiz (Rudolph 1975)
· calling for many arrows (ESV)
· you commission your arrows (NET)
· swearing oaths with the arrows
of your word (LEB)
· you called for many arrows (NIV)
מַטּ֖וֹת
Noun FGP Construct, Appositional N to קַשְׁתֶּ֔ךָ (the
P would agree in sense), namely, arrows. See KB, Lexicon, 573.
אֹ֣מֶר
Noun MAS Absolute, A of Manner, with a [divine] command.
סֶ֑לָה
Interjection, Selah. Unclear but possibly a musical
notation (see note below). “סֶ֫לָה,
a word of unknown sense found only in the Psalter and in the psalm of Habakkuk
3 and apparently some sort of exclamation.” (Waltke & O’Connor, Syntax,
681). Disjunctive accent.
נְהָר֖וֹת
Noun FAP Absolute, Adverbial A of Means, with rivers. Forward
emphasis.
תְּבַקַּע־אָֽרֶץ׃
PiI 2MS, Persistent I + Noun FAS Absolute, A Direct Object, you
split the earth. See NET note at verse 3.
“A literal rendering like ‘You split the earth with rivers’ (so NIV, NRSV)
suggests geological activity to the modern reader, but in the present context
of a violent thunderstorm, the idea of streams swollen to torrents by downpours
better fits the imagery. As the Lord comes in a thunderstorm the downpour
causes streams to swell to river-like proportions and spread over the surface
of the ground, causing flash floods. (NET, loc. cit.)
“This may be understood either as signifying that the earth trembles at the
wrath of the Judge, and rents arise in consequence, through which rivers of
water burst forth from the deep, or so that at the quaking of the earth the sea
pours its waves over the land and splits it into rivers. The following verses
point to an earthquake through which the form of the earth’s surface is
changed. (K&D, loc. cit.)
“The parallel between this verse and parts of Deuteronomy 32 is striking. The
Song of Moses speaks of a consuming fire (Deut. 32:22), pestilence and plagues
(Deut. 32:24), and arrows drunk with blood (Deut. 32:42) as part of His oath
for vengeance against His adversaries (Deut. 32:41).” (BKC, loc. cit.)
10
“The effect of the coming of God upon the mountains was already referred to
in v. 6. There they crumbled into ruins, here they writhe with terror. This
difference is to be explained from the fact that there (v. 6) the general
effect of the omnipotence of God upon nature was intended, whereas here (vv.
10, 11) the special effect is described, which is produced upon nature by the
judgment about to be executed by God upon the nations. (K&D, loc. cit.)
רָא֤וּךָ
QPf 3CP, Persistent Pf + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct Object, Antecedent
= הָרִ֔ים below, P= sense
agreement), they see you. See NET note at verse 3. Disjunctive
accent.
יָחִ֙ילוּ֙
QI 3MP, Progressive I, they writhe. Copulative asyndeton. See
NET note at verse 3.
הָרִ֔ים
Noun MNP Absolute, Subject N, the mountains. Disjunctive
accent.
זֶ֥רֶם
Noun MNS Construct, Subject N in Noun Clause, a heavy rain
of. Forward emphasis.
מַ֖יִם
Noun MGP Absolute, Descriptive G, waters.
עָבָ֑ר
QPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, passes through. Disjunctive
accent. See NET note at verse 3.
נָתַ֤ן
QPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, gives. Copulative asyndeton. See
NET note at verse 3.
תְּהוֹם֙
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, the deep.
קוֹל֔וֹ
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive,
Antecedent = תְּהוֹם֙, its
voice. Disjunctive accent.
ר֖וֹם
Noun MAS Construct, A of Manner, on high. Forward
emphasis.
יָדֵ֥יהוּ
Noun FAD Construct, A Direct Object + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive,
Antecedent = תְּהוֹם֙, its
hands. KB, Lexicon, 388, “of a watercourse: bank.”
נָשָֽׂא׃
QPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, lifts up. See NET note at verse 3.
11
With asyndeton the imagery of verses 8-10 continue. “The
God of nature can alter and control all the powers of nature to make earth, sea
and heavenly bodies carry out the purposes of His judgment against sinners, or
for the salvation of His people.” (Brooks, K. (2009). Summarized Bible:
Complete Summary of the Old Testament (p. 207). Bellingham,
WA: Logos Bible Software.) [Hereafter as Brooks, Summarized Bible]
שֶׁ֥מֶשׁ
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, the sun. Forward emphasis.
יָרֵ֖חַ
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, the moon. Copulative asyndeton. Forward
emphasis.
עָ֣מַד
QPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, stand. See NET note at verse 3.
זְבֻ֑לָה
Noun MAS Absolute, Adverbial A of Place + Directional ה, in lofty habitation. “זְבוּל with ה local, a dwelling-place, is, according to
oriental view, the place from which the stars come out when they rise, and to
which they return when they set.” (K&D, loc. cit.) Disjunctive
accent.
לְא֤וֹר
Preposition, Directive + Noun MGS Absolute, towards the
light. Forward emphasis. Probably a metonomy of effect for
the sun. “This is when the effect is put for the cause producing it.”
(Bullinger, Figures of speech, 560).
חִצֶּ֙יךָ֙
Noun MNP Construct, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive,
Antecedent = יְהוָ֔ה, your
arrows. אוֹר חִצֶּיךָ (lightnings, KB, Lexicon,
342)
יְהַלֵּ֔כוּ
PiI 3CP, Progressive I, vanish. See KB, Lexicon,
247. Disjunctive accent. See NET note at verse 3.
It is not, however, that they “turn pale in consequence of the surpassing
brilliancy of the lightnings” (Ewald), but that they “withdraw altogether, from
the fear and horror which pervade all nature, and which are expressed in the
mountains by trembling, in the waters by roaring, and in the sun and moon by
obscuration” (K&D, loc. cit). “In His wrath God often used and
controlled the forces of nature.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
לְנֹ֖גַהּ
Preposition, Reference + Noun MGS Construct, with respect to the
brightness of. Hb 3:11 (of glitter of י׳’s spear),” BDB, Lexicon, 618.
בְּרַ֥ק
Noun MGS Construct, Verbal G of Means, the flashes of
lightning. “ בְּרַק חֲנִיתhas
the same meaning here as in Nah. 3:3.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
חֲנִיתֶֽךָ׃
Noun FGS Construct, Verbal G of Instrument + Personal Pronoun
MGS, Possessive, Antecedent = יְהוָ֔ה, coming
from your spear.
12
Asyndetically “a description of the judgment upon the nations
for the rescue of the people of God.” (K&D, loc. cit.); also, “The
preternatural dimension of the saving theophany is described in mythological
language. The parallelism of v 12 is perfect.” (Anderson, Habakkuk,
334)
בְּזַ֖עַם
Preposition, Manner + Noun MGS Absolute, with indignation. Forward
emphasis.
תִּצְעַד־אָ֑רֶץ
QI 2MS, Progressive I + Noun FAS Absolute, G of Place, you march
through the earth. Disjunctive accent. See NET note at verse 3.
בְּאַ֖ף
Preposition, Manner + Noun MGS Absolute, with anger. Forward
emphasis and asyndetic.
תָּד֥וּשׁ
QI 2MS, Progressive I, you trample down. See NET note at
verse 3.
גּוֹיִֽם׃
Noun MAP Absolute, A Direct Object, nations. Disjunctive
accent.
13
“Here at last is the answer to the questions of verse 8.” (Clark &
Hatton, Habakkuk, 129)
יָצָ֙אתָ֙
QPf 2MS, Persistent Pf, you go forth. Copulative asyndeton. See
NET note at verse 3.
לְיֵ֣שַׁע
Preposition, Purpose + Noun MGS Construct, for the salvation of.
עַמֶּ֔ךָ
Noun MGS Absolute, Objective G + Personal Pronoun MGS, G of
Relationship, Antecedent = יְהוָ֔ה, your
people. Disjunctive accent.
לְיֵ֖שַׁע
Preposition, Purpose + Noun MGS Construct, for the salvation of.
Asyndetic in apposition.
אֶת־מְשִׁיחֶ֑ךָ
Particle of Direct Object + Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object + Personal
Pronoun MGS, G of Relationship, Antecedent = יְהוָ֔ה, that
is, your anointed. Disjunctive accent. Consider the various opinions
in the following notes.
“Salvation was for God’s people, but it was also for the anointed One, a term
never used in the Old Testament for the nation Israel. The term probably refers
to the coming Messiah (cf. Ps. 2:2; Dan. 9:26). By preserving the people of
Israel (delivering them from Egypt and then later from Babylonian Captivity),
God maintained the line for the Messiah.” (BKC, loc. cit.)
“In this context the term has multiple meanings. In reference to the exodus it
would most likely point to Moses. But in Habakkuk’s day it referred to God’s
anointed people in general and a hoped-for king/deliverer in particular. In the
context of sacred canon it looked forward to Messiah, fulfilled in the life,
sufferings, death, resurrection, and salvation of Jesus of Nazareth.”
(Barker, Habakkuk, 369)
“However, in this context, where thy anointed is parallel with thy people, it
seems more likely that it refers to the nation of Israel as a whole.” (Clark
& Hatton, Habakkuk, 129)
“The ‘anointed one.’ again, is not the nation of Israel, for the term is always
applied to a single individual and never to the people collectively; so here it
is the theocratic king who is meant—first, the representative of David; and
secondly, the Messiah.” (Spence-Jones, Habakkuk, p. 54).
מָחַ֤צְתָּ
QPf 2MS, Persistent Pf, you smash. See NET note at verse
3.
רֹּאשׁ֙
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object, the head.
מִבֵּ֣ית
Preposition, Source + Noun MGS Construct, from the house of.
רָשָׁ֔ע
Noun MGS Absolute, the wicked. Disjunctive accent.
עָר֛וֹת
PiInf Absolute, Adverbial Gerund, laying bare. “עָרֹות, a rare form of the inf. abs., like שָׁתֹות in Isa. 22:13 (cf. Ewald, § 240, b),
from עֵרָה, to make bare, to destroy from the very
foundation, the infinitive in the sense of the gerund describing the mode of
the action.” (K&D, loc. cit.) Forward emphasis and Asyndetic.
יְס֥וֹד
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object, the foundation.
עַד־צַוָּ֖אר
Preposition, Inclusive + Noun MGS Absolute, the neck.
פ סֶֽלָה׃
Interjection, selah.
14
“These final two verses of this ode on God’s awesome self-revelation speak
of the ultimate destruction of the enemy.” (BKC, loc. cit.) Copulative asyndeton.
נָקַ֤בְתָּ
QP 2MS, Persistent P, You pierce. See NET note at verse 3.
בְמַטָּיו֙
Preposition, Means + Noun MGP Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive
G, Antecedent = פְּרָ֯זָ֔ו, Collective
S, with their arrows. KB, Lexicon, 573.
רֹ֣אשׁ
Noun MAS Construct, A Direct Object, Collective S, the heads of.
פְּרָזוֹ
Noun MGS Construct, Possessive G, Collective S + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive G, Collective S, their warriors. “The meaning of the
Hebrew term פְּרָזוֹ (pérazo), translated
here ‘his warriors,’ is uncertain.” (NET loc. cit.) Disjunctive accent over the
variant פְּרָזָ֔יו.
יִסְעֲר֖וּ
QI 3CP, Progressive I, they storm in. See NET note at
verse 3.
לַהֲפִיצֵ֑נִי
Preposition, Purpose + HiInf Construct + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct
Object, Collective S (but see ESV as a reference to Habakkuk; see note below
after בַּמִּסְתָּֽר), Antecedent
= Judah, to scatter us. Disjunctive accent.
עֲלִ֣יצֻתָ֔ם
Noun FAS Construct, Adverbial A of Manner + Personal Pronoun MGP
(P=reversal from previous S; see above), Adjectival Attributive G, Antecedent =
warriors, in their rejoicing. Disjunctive accent.
כְּמוֹ־לֶאֱכֹ֥ל
Preposition, Comparative + Q Inf Construct, like devouring.
עָנִ֖י
Adjective MAS Absolute, Substantival A Direct Object, the
oppressed.
בַּמִּסְתָּֽר׃
Preposition, Manner + Article, Abstract + Noun MGS Absolute, in
secret. KB, Lexicon, 608, “in the secret place.”
“The remainder of v. 14 [beginning at יִסְעֲר֖וּ] is
extremely difficult textually. According to Roberts it is ‘quite obscure.’ In
the Hebrew text the next line is ‘they stormed to scatter me.’ According to
Robertson ‘me’ is most likely the prophet who in spite of his visionary state
still sees himself as experiencing the onslaughts of the enemy. Robertson’s
translation of the rest of the verse is perhaps the best attempt to understand
the Hebrew as it stands: ‘Their rejoicing (is) / as one who devours the poor in
secret.’” (Barker, Habakkuk, 371)
15
Copulative asyndeton.
דָּרַ֥כְתָּ
QPf 2MS, Persistent Pf, you trample. See NET note at verse
3.
בַיָּ֖ם
Preposition, Locative + Article, Particularizing + Noun MGS Absolute, in
the sea.
סוּסֶ֑יךָ
Noun MAP Construct, Adverbial A of Manner + Personal Pronoun MGS,
Possessive G, Antecedent = יְהוָ֔ה, with
your horses. Disjunctive accent.
חֹ֖מֶר
Noun MGS Construct, the heap of. KB, Lexicon, 330,
translates as “foaming” as the only OT use with this sense. However, K&D,
loc. cit., prefers “Chōmer, in the sense of heap, as in Ex. 8:10, is not an
accusative, but is still dependent upon the ב of
the parallel clause. The expression ‘heap of many waters’ serves simply to fill
up the picture, as in Ps. 77:20.” This would be an appositional statement.
Other translations (NASB, ESV, NET) prefer “surge/surging.” The semantic
differences appear to be negligible.
מַ֥יִם
Noun MGP Absolute, G of Description, waters.
רַבִּֽים׃
Adjective MGP, Attributive, many.
_______________
Verse 8
Did the LORD rage against the rivers,
Or was Your anger against the rivers,
Or was Your wrath against the sea,
That You rode on Your horses,
On Your chariots of salvation?
- Rhetorical question.
- Change of person from 3rd to
2nd.
- All lines = grammatical and
semantic parallelism.
Verse 9
Your bow was made bare,
The rods of chastisement were sworn. Selah.
You cleaved the earth with rivers.
- Semantic parallelism in lines
1 & 2.
- Line 3 is the cause of
the effects in verse 10.
Verse 10
(A) The mountains saw You and quaked;
(B) The downpour of waters swept by.
(A) The deep uttered forth its voice,
(B) It lifted high its hands.
- ABAB Parallel lines (B’s
adding to A’s).
- Verses 9 and 10 need to be
read together.
Verse 11
Sun and moon stood in their places;
They went away at the light of Your arrows,
At the radiance of Your gleaming spear.
- Semantic parallels of the
light motif in all lines.
- Lines 1 and 2 have a
progressive parallelism pattern.
- Line 3 adds to line 2 with
apposition of light motifs and warfare items.
Verse 12
In indignation You marched through the earth;
In anger You trampled the nations.
- Grammatical parallelism.
- Line 2 interprets line 1.
Verse 13
(A) You went forth for the salvation of Your people,
(B) For the salvation of Your anointed.
(A) You struck the head of the house of
the evil
(B) To lay him open from thigh to neck. Selah.
- ABAB poetic pattern (B’s
interpreting A’s).
- Line 2 has verbal ellipsis.
- Lines 1 and 2 = Interpretive
parallelism (see the notes).
- See the notes on line 4.
Verse 14
You pierced with his own spears
The head of his throngs.
They stormed in to scatter us;
Their exultation was like those
Who devour the oppressed in secret.
- A 3 line verse based on the
Hebrew accents.
- The verb “pierced” in line 1
parallels “struck” in verse 13, line 3.
- The “head” in line one
connects to line 3 of verse 13.
Verse 15
You trampled on the sea with Your horses,
On the surge of many waters.
- Line 2 semantically
interprets line 1.
- Verbal ellipsis in
line 2.
Faith In God And
His Character Is The Key To Living In Times
Of Violence And
Perverted Justice!
I. Why Is Yahweh Unresponsive to My Prayers? 1:1-11
II. Yahweh’s Response Concerning Babylon, 2:1-20
III. Habakkuk’s Prayer, 3:1-19
A. Fear and Revival, 1-2
B. Theophany, 3-15
C. Habakkuk’s Fright and Faith, 16-19
16
Verse 16 echoes v. 2. “Verse 16 follows the
theophany with the prophet’s response to wait quietly for the evil to come on
the Babylonians.” (Barker, Habakkuk, 372)
שָׁמַ֣עְתִּי׀
QPf 1CS, Persistent Pf, I hear. On the pase q see
GKC, Grammar, p. 50, note 2; Scott, A Simplified Guide to
BHS, p. 5.
וַתִּרְגַּ֣ז
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3FS, Progressive I, and . . .
trembles.
בִּטְנִ֗י
Noun FNS Construct, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive, Antecedent =
Habakkuk), my inward being. Disjunctive accent.
לְקוֹל֙
Preposition, Reference + Noun MGS Absolute, at the sound. Forward
emphasis. Asyndetic.
צָלֲל֣וּ
QPf 3CP, Persistent Pf, quiver.
שְׂפָתַ֔י
Noun FND Construct, Subject N + Personal Pronoun MGS (Possessive, Antecedent =
Habakkuk), my lips. Disjunctive accent.
יָב֥וֹא
QI 3MS, Progressive I, enters. Asyndetic.
רָקָ֛ב
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, rottenness.
בַּעֲצָמַ֖י
Preposition, Locative + Noun FGP Construct + Personal Pronoun, Possessive G,
Antecedent = Habakkuk), into my bones. Disjunctive accent.
וְתַחְתַּ֣י
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Preposition, Locative + Personal Pronoun
MGS, Antecedent = Habakkuk), and underneath me. Forward
emphasis. “under me, i.e., in my lower members, knees, feet.” (K&D, loc.
cit.)
אֶרְגָּ֑ז
QI 1CS, Progressive I, I tremble. Disjunctive accent.
אֲשֶׁ֤ר
Particle, Causal, because.
אָנ֙וּחַ֙
QI 1CS, Modal of Obligation, I must wait. “Nūăch, to rest, not
to rest in the grave (Luther and others), nor to bear quietly or endure (Ges.,
Maurer), but to wait quietly or silently.” (K&D, loc. cit.) NET, loc. cit.
opts for an unattested verb: “I long for the day of distress” to come upon the
Babylonians.
לְי֣וֹם
Preposition, Terminative + Noun MGS Construct, for the day of.
צָרָ֔ה
Noun FGS Absolute, distress. Disjunctive accent.
לַעֲל֖וֹת
Preposition, Terminative + Q Inf Construct, Gerundive, for the
coming. Appositional to the preceding phrase.
לְעַ֥ם
Preposition, Reference + Noun MGS Absolute, Collective S, of the
people.
“The NIV and most other versions (e.g., the ESV, NET, NRSV, NLT, and NJB)
render verse 16 to say that the prophet waits for calamity to come up on the
invading nation, but the NASB and the NJPS understand the verse to say that the
prophet waits for the invasion to come upon Judah.” (Ham & Hahlen, Minor
Prophets, 167) The function of the ל and
the identification of the עם holds
the interpretive key here.
יְגוּדֶֽנּוּ׃
QI 3MS, Future I, Collective S + Personal Pronoun 1CPA, A Direct Object,
Antecedent = Judah), [who] will attack us. Disjunctive accent.
The 3MS seems to identify the עם.
17
“Of all the wonderful passages in the Old Testament, the climax to Habakkuk’s
psalm fits as one of the great affirmations of faith. His circumstances have
not changed. The outer world with its evil conduct and rapacious warfare
remains the same. God’s people remain in time of lamentation.” (Barker, Habakkuk,
375)
“In v. 17 the trouble of this day is described; and the sensation of
pain, in the anticipation of the period of calamity, is thereby still further
accounted for. The plantations and fields yield no produce. Folds and stalls
are empty in consequence of the devastation of the land by the hostile troops
and their depredations: ‘a prophetic picture of the devastation of the holy
land by the Chaldaean war’(Delitzsch). Fig-tree and vine are mentioned as the
noblest fruit-trees of the land, as is frequently the case (see Joel 1:7; Hos.
2:14; Mic. 4:4). To this there is added the olive-tree, as in Mic. 6:15, Deut.
6:11; 8:8, etc. Ma’asēh zayith is not the shoot, but the
produce or fruit of the olive-tree, after the phrase עָשָׂה פְרִי, to bear fruit. Kichēsh, to
disappoint, namely the expectation of produce, as in Hos. 9:2. Shedēmōth,
which only occurs in the plural, corn-fields, is construed here as in Isa.
16:8, with the verb in the singular, because, so far as the sense was
concerned, it had become almost equivalent to sâdeh, the field (see
Ewald, § 318, a). Gâzar, to cut off, used here in a neuter
sense: to be cut off or absent. מִכְלָה,
contracted from מִכְלָאָה: fold, pen, an
enclosed place for sheep. Repheth, ἁπ. λεγ., the rack, then
the stable or stall.” (K&D, loc. cit.)
כִּֽי־תְאֵנָ֣ה
Paratactic Conjunction, Concession + Noun FNS Absolute, Subject N, though
the fig tree. The apodosis of the concession appears at verse 18.
Forward emphasis.
לֹֽא־תִפְרָ֗ח
Adverb, Negation + QI 3FS, I of Possibility, may not blossom. Disjunctive
accent.
וְאֵ֤ין
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Negative Adverb, and . . . there may
be no.
יְבוּל֙
Noun MNS Absolute, Predicate N, fruit. Forward emphasis.
בַּגְּפָנִ֔ים
Preposition, Locative + Article, Particular + Noun MGP Absolute, on the
vines. Disjunctive accent.
כִּחֵשׁ֙
PiPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, fails. Copulative asyndeton.
מַעֲשֵׂה־זַ֔יִת
Noun MNS Construct, Subject N + Noun MGS Absolute, Partitive G, Collective
S, the crop of olives. Disjunctive accent.
וּשְׁדֵמ֖וֹת
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Noun FNP Absolute, Subject N, and
the cultivated fields. Forward emphasis.
לֹא־עָ֣שָׂה
Adverb, Negation + QPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, Collective S, do not
yield. Perhaps the S focuses on the individual fields.
אֹ֑כֶל
Noun MAS Absolute, A Direct Object, food. Disjunctive accent.
גָּזַ֤ר
QPf 3MS, Persistent Pf, is cut off. Copulative asyndeton.
מִמִּכְלָה֙
Preposition, Separation + Noun FGS Absolute, from the fold.
צֹ֔אן
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N, the flock. Disjunctive
accent.
וְאֵ֥ין
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + Negative Adverb, and there are no.
בָּקָ֖ר
Noun MNS Absolute, Predicate N, Collective S, cattle.
בָּרְפָתִֽים׃
Preposition, Locative + Article, Particularizing + Noun MGP Absolute, in
the stalls. Disjunctive accent.
18
“The turning-point is introduced with וַאֲנִי,
as is frequently the case in the Psalms.” (K&D, loc. cit.) Reflect on the
notes at verse 17.
וַאֲנִ֖י
Paratactic Conjunction, Adversative + Personal Pronoun MS, Emphasis, Antecedent
= Habakkuk), but I.
“Nevertheless I. The use of the personal pronoun is very emphatic and
indicates a tremendous assertion of faith. The response is intensely
individual. There is no prophetic outreach to the people. It supports our
argument that the whole of this prophecy is a testament of Habakkuk in his
private crisis of faith. If this is so, it is an exception to the rule that
God’s dealings with the prophets were always for public purposes.”
(Anderson, Habakkuk, 347)
“The sentence beginning with the six ‘concessive’ (‘though’) clauses of v. 17
are continued in v. 18 with two clauses expressing contrast or
‘counterexpectation.’ The contrastive sense of these clauses is indicated by
the word order of the first clause (beginning waʾaʾnî, ‘yet I’). In
v. 18 the prophet gave his reaction to the imminent events. Let the nation face
the worst economic disasters; still the prophet vowed to remain faithful to the
God of his salvation.” (Barker, Habakkuk, 376)
בַּיהוָ֣ה
Preposition, Emotion + Noun MGS Construct, in Yahweh. Forward
emphasis.
אֶעְל֑וֹזָה
QCoh 1CS, Coh of Resolve, I resolve to exult. Disjunctive
accent.
אָגִ֖ילָה
QCoh 1CS, Coh of Resolve, I resolve to rejoice. Copulative asyndeton.
בֵּאלֹהֵ֥י
Preposition, Emotion + Noun MGP Construct, in the God of.
יִשְׁעִֽי׃
Noun MGS Absolute, Objective G (NET, loc. cit., transposes to a verb
pattern) + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive G, Antecedent = Habakkuk), my
salvation. Disjunctive accent.
19
“This is the only place outside the Psalms (16:2; 68:20; 109:21; 140:7; 141:8)
that the phrase yahweh ʾădōnāy (‘Sovereign Lord’) occurs [in
this order].” (Barker, Habakkuk, 377)
יְהוִ֤ה
Noun MNS Absolute, Subject N in Noun Clause, Yahweh. The
clause is Asyndetic of explanation.
אֲדֹנָי֙
Noun MNP Absolute, N in Apposition + Personal Pronoun MGS, G Relationship,
Antecedent = Habakkuk), Lord. Disjunctive accent. “of י׳ always אֲדֹנָי,
fossilized sffx.” (KB, Lexicon, 13) Asyndetic.
חֵילִ֔י
Noun MNS Absolute, N in Apposition + Personal Pronoun MGS, G of Relationship,
Antecedent = Habakkuk, my Strength. Asyndetic. Disjunctive
accent. “Or perhaps, “is my wall,” that is, “my protector.” (NET, loc. cit.,
Taken from the noun חֵיל and the sense
of “rampart”) The translations differ.
וַיָּ֤שֶׂם
Paratactic Conjunction, Relative + QI 3MS, Persistent I), and he makes.
רַגְלַי֙
Noun FAD Construct, A Direct Object + Personal Pronoun MGS, G of Possession,
Antecedent = Habakkuk), my feet.
כָּֽאַיָּל֔וֹת
Preposition, Comparative + Article, Species + Noun FGP Absolute, like
the deer. Disjunctive accent.
וְעַ֥ל
Hypotactic Conjunction, Relative + Preposition, and upon.
בָּמוֹתַ֖י
Noun FGP Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS, G of Possession, Antecedent =
Habakkuk), my high places.
יַדְרִכֵ֑נִי
HiI 3MS, Progressive I + Personal Pronoun MAS, A Direct Object, Antecedent =
Habakkuk), he causes me to walk.
לַמְנַצֵּ֖חַ
Preposition, Advantage + Article, Particularizing + PiPtc MGS Absolute,
Substantival, for the choir director.
בִּנְגִינוֹתָֽי׃
Preposition, Manner + Noun FGP Construct + Personal Pronoun MGS, Possessive
G, Antecedent = Habakkuk), on my stringed instruments.
“The concluding words, For the director of music. On my stringed
instruments, serve as an addendum and are related to the heading of the
prophet’s doxological ode (Hab. 3:1). They refer to the use of this song in
worship. The prophet appointed his psalm for use in public worship accompanied
by players with stringed instruments. The sour drone of Habakkuk’s complaining
(1:2–4, 12–2:1) was replaced by vibrant chords of hope and happiness.”
(BKC, Habakkuk, 1522)
_______________
Verse 16
I heard and my inward parts trembled,
At the sound my lips quivered.
Decay enters my bones,
And in my place I tremble.
Because I must wait quietly for the day of distress,
For the people to arise who will invade us.
- Lines 1-4 relate to the body (see the notes on
line 4).
- Line 6 expands line 5.
Verse 17
Though the fig tree should not blossom
And there be no fruit on the vines,
Though the yield of the olive should fail
And the fields produce no food,
Though the flock should be cut off from
the fold
And there be no cattle in the stalls,
- 6 Colons.
- The term “though” appears only in line 1.
- Alternating from singular to plural throughout.
- Each line has a negative.
Verse 18
Yet I will exult in the Lord,
I will rejoice in the God of my salvation.
- Line 2 parallels line 1 grammatically and
semantically.
Verse 19
The Lord God is my
strength,
And He has made my feet like hinds’ feet,
And makes me walk on my high places.
- Line 1 has three titles for God (Yahweh,
Elohim, Strength).
- Line 3 expands line 2.
For the choir director, on my stringed instruments.
No comments:
Post a Comment